Gorilla in the room: Even experts can miss polyps at colonoscopy and how AI helps complex visual perception tasks

  • Andrea Cherubini
    Corresponding author at: Cosmo AI/Linkverse, Via Colombo 1, Lainate 20045, Italy.
    Artificial Intelligence Group, Cosmo AI/Linkverse, Lainate 20045, Italy

    Milan Center for Neuroscience, University of Milano–Bicocca, Milano 20126, Italy
    Search for articles by this author
  • James E. East
    Translational Gastroenterology Unit, Nuffield Department of Medicine, Experimental Medicine Division, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

    Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Healthcare, London
    Search for articles by this author
Published:October 26, 2022DOI:
      Colonoscopy prevents colon cancer through the detection and removal of precancerous lesions. Endoscopists know that optimal maneuvering of the colonoscope to expose mucosa and sufficient inspection time are critical elements for effective detection. At the same time, they also know that poor bowel preparation and operator fatigue harm detection rates.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Digestive and Liver Disease
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Wallace M.B.
        • Sharma P.
        • Bhandari P.
        • East J.
        • Antonelli G.
        • Lorenzetti R.
        • et al.
        Impact of artificial intelligence on miss rate of colorectal neoplasia.
        Gastroenterology. 2022; 163: 295-304
        • Spadaccini M.
        • Iannone A.
        • Maselli R.
        • Badalamenti M.
        • Desai M.
        • Chandrasekar V.T.
        • et al.
        Computer-aided detection versus advanced imaging for detection of colorectal neoplasia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
        Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. Oct 2021; 6: 793-802
        • Whitney D.
        • Levi D.M.
        Visual crowding: a fundamental limit on conscious perception and object recognition.
        Trends Cogn Sci. Apr 2011; 15: 160-168
        • Xia Y.
        • Manassi M.
        • Nakayama K.
        • Zipser K.
        • Whitney D.
        Visual crowding in driving.
        J Vis. 3 Jun 2020; 20: 1
        • Kundel H.L.
        • Nodine C.F.
        • Thickman D.
        • Toto L.
        Searching for lung nodules. A comparison of human performance with random and systematic scanning models.
        Invest Radiol. May 1987; 22: 417-422
        • Lago M.A.
        • Jonnalagadda A.
        • Abbey C.K.
        • Barufaldi B.B.
        • Bakic P.R.
        • Maidment A.D.A.
        • et al.
        Under-exploration of three-dimensional images leads to search errors for small salient targets.
        Curr Biol CB. 8 Mar 2021; 31: 1099-1106
        • Lami M.
        • Singh H.
        • Dilley J.H.
        • Ashraf H.
        • Edmondon M.
        • Orihuela-Espina F.
        • et al.
        Gaze patterns hold key to unlocking successful search strategies and increasing polyp detection rate in colonoscopy.
        Endoscopy. Jul 2018; 50: 701-707
        • Drew T.
        • Vo M.L.H.
        • Olwal A.
        • Jacobson F.
        • Seltzer S.E.
        • Wolfe J.M.
        Scanners and drillers: characterizing expert visual search through volumetric images.
        J Vis. 6 Aug 2013; 13: 3
        • Cain M.S.
        • Vul E.
        • Clark K.
        • Mitroff S.R.
        A bayesian optimal foraging model of human visual search.
        Psychol Sci. 1 Sep 2012; 23: 1047-1054
        • Drew T.
        • Võ M.L.H.
        • Wolfe J.M.
        The invisible gorilla strikes again: sustained inattentional blindness in expert observers.
        Psychol Sci. Sep 2013; 24: 1848-1853
        • Evans K.K.
        • Birdwell R.L.
        • Wolfe J.M.
        If you don't find it often, you often don't find it: why some cancers are missed in breast cancer screening.
        PloS One. 2013; 8: e64366
        • Moussata D.
        • Allez M.
        • Cazals-Hatem D.
        • Treton X.
        • Laharie D.
        • Reimund J.M.
        • et al.
        Are random biopsies still useful for the detection of neoplasia in patients with IBD undergoing surveillance colonoscopy with chromoendoscopy?.
        Gut. Apr 2018; 67: 616-624
        • Al-Yahya E.
        • Dawes H.
        • Smith L.
        • Dennis A.
        • Howells K.
        • Cockburn J.
        Cognitive motor interference while walking: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Neurosci Biobehav Rev. Jan 2011; 35: 715-728
        • Biffi C.
        • Salvagnini P.
        • Dinh N.N.
        • Hassan C.
        • Sharma P.
        • GI Genius CADx Study Group
        A novel AI device for real-time optical characterization of colorectal polyps.
        NPJ Digit Med. 30 Jun 2022; 5: 84
        • Reverberi C.
        • Rigon T.
        • Solari A.
        • Hassan C.
        • Cherubini P.
        • GI Genius CADx Study Group
        Experimental evidence of effective human-AI collaboration in medical decision-making.
        Sci Rep. 2 Sep 2022; 12: 14952