Advertisement

Score reproducibility and reliability in differentiating small bowel subepithelial masses from innocent bulges

Published:August 04, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2022.06.027

      Abstract

      Aims

      The primary aim of this study was to assess the reliability, intra- and inter-observer variation of the SPICE, Mucosal protrusion angle (MPA) and SHYUNG scores in differentiating a subepithelial mass (SEM) from a bulge.

      Methods

      This retrospective multicentre study analysed the 3 scores, radiological studies, enteroscopy and/or surgical findings.

      Results

      100 patients with a potential SEM (mean age 57.6years) were recruited with 75 patients having pathology. In patients with a SEM the mean SPICE score was 2.04 (95% CI 1.82–2.26) as compared to 1.16 (95% CI 0.81–1.51) without any pathology (AUC 0.74, p<0.001), with a fair intra-observer agreement (Kappa 0.3, p<0.001) and slight inter-observer agreement (Kappa 0.14, p<0.05). SPICE had a 37.3% sensitivity and 92.0% specificity in distinguishing between a SEM and bulge, whereas MPA<90˚ had 58.7% and 76.0% respectively, with poor intra-observer(p = 0.05) and interobserver agreement (p = 0.64). The SHYUNG demonstrated a moderate intra-observer (Kappa 0.44, p<0.001) and slight inter-observer reliability (Kappa 0.18, p<0.001). The sensitivity of an elevated SHYUNG score (≥4) in identifying a SEM was 18.7% with a specificity of 92.0% (AUC 0.71, p = 0.002).

      Conclusions

      Though these scores are easy to use, they have, at best, slight to moderate intra and inter-observer agreement. Their overall diagnostic performances are limited.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Digestive and Liver Disease
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Pennazio M.
        • Spada C.
        • Eliakim R.
        • et al.
        Small-bowel capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy for diagnosis and treatment of small-bowel disorders: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline.
        Endoscopy. Apr 2015; 47: 352-376
        • Spada C.
        • McNamara D.
        • Despott E.J.
        • et al.
        Performance measures for small-bowel endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative.
        United European Gastroenterol J. Jun 2019; 7: 614-641
        • Rondonotti E.
        • Koulaouzidis A.
        • Yung D.E.
        • et al.
        Neoplastic diseases of the small bowel.
        Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. Jan 2017; 27: 93-112
        • Mergener K.
        • Ponchon T.
        • Gralnek I.
        • et al.
        Literature review and recommendations for clinical application of small-bowel capsule endoscopy, based on a panel discussion by international experts. Consensus statements for small-bowel capsule endoscopy, 2006/2007.
        Endoscopy. 2007; 39: 895-909
        • Girelli C.M.
        • Porta P.
        • Colombo E.
        • et al.
        Development of a novel index to discriminate bulge from mass on small-bowel capsule endoscopy.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 74: 1067-1074
        • Min M.
        • Noujaim M.G.
        • Green J.
        • et al.
        Role of mucosal protrusion angle in discriminating between true and false masses of the small bowel on video capsule endoscopy.
        J Clin Med. 2019; 8: 418
        • Shyung L.R.
        • Lin S.C.
        • Shih S.C.
        • et al.
        Proposed scoring system to determine small bowel mass lesions using capsule endoscopy.
        J Formos Med Assoc. 2009; 108: 533-538
        • Sidhu R.
        • Chetcuti Zammit S.
        • Baltes P.
        • et al.
        Curriculum for small-bowel capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy training in Europe: european Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement.
        Endoscopy. 2020; 52: 669-686
        • Brotz C.
        • Nandi N.
        • Conn M.
        • et al.
        A validation study of 3 grading systems to evaluate small-bowel cleansing for wireless capsule endoscopy: a quantitative index, a qualitative evaluation, and an overall adequacy assessment.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 69 (262-70, 270.e1)
        • Landis J.R.
        • Koch G.G.
        The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.
        Biometrics. 1977; 33 (PMID: 843571): 159-174
        • Rodrigues J.P.
        • Pinho R.
        • Rodrigues A.
        • et al.
        Validation of SPICE, a method to differentiate small bowel submucosal lesions from innocent bulges on capsule endoscopy.
        Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2017; 109: 106-113
        • Afecto E.
        • Pinho R.
        • Gomes C.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of a new composite score combining SPICE and Protrusion Angle scores to distinguish submucosal lesions from innocent bulges.
        Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2021;
        • Gauci J.
        • Sammut L.
        • Sciberras M.
        • et al.
        Small bowel imaging in Crohn's disease patients.
        Ann Gastroenterol. 2018; 31: 395-405