Advertisement

Determinants of symptom burden related to bowel preparation for colonoscopy

      ABSTRACT

      Background

      Symptoms developing during bowel preparation are major concerns among subjects who refuse the procedure.

      Aims

      We aimed to explore the determinants of symptoms occurring during preparation among patients undergoing elective colonoscopy.

      Methods

      This is a prospective multicenter study conducted in 10 Italian hospitals. A multidimensional approach collecting socio-demographic, clinical, psychological and occupational information before colonoscopy through validated instruments was used. Outcome was a four-category cumulative score based on symptoms occurring during preparation, according to the Mayo Clinic Bowel Prep Tolerability Questionnaire, weighted by intensity. Missing values were addressed through multiple imputation. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated through multivariate logistic regression models.

      Results

      1137 subjects were enrolled. Severe symptoms were associated with female sex (OR=3.64, 95%CI 1.94-6.83), heavier working hours (OR=1.13, 95% CI=1.01-1.25), previous gastrointestinal symptoms (OR=7.81, 95% CI 2.36-25.8 for high score), somatic symptoms (OR=2.19, 95% CI=1.06-4.49 for multiple symptoms), day-before regimen (OR=2.71, 95%CI 1.28-5.73). On the other hand, age ≥60 years (OR=0.10, 95% CI 0.02-0.44) and good mood (p=0.042) were protective factors. A high-risk profile was identified, including women with low mood and somatic symptoms (OR=15.5, 95%CI 4.56-52.7).

      Conclusions

      We identified previously unreported determinants of symptoms burdening bowel preparation and identified a particularly vulnerable phenotype. Symptoms during preparation especially impact heavier working activity.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Digestive and Liver Disease
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Yang C
        • Sriranjan V
        • Abou-Setta AM
        • et al.
        Anxiety associated with colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy: a systematic review.
        Am J Gastroenterol. Dec 2018; 113 (Epub 2018 Nov 1. PMID: 30385831; PMCID: PMC6768596): 1810-1818https://doi.org/10.1038/s41395-018-0398-8
        • McLachlan SA
        • Clements A
        • Austoker J.
        Patients' experiences and reported barriers to colonoscopy in the screening context–a systematic review of the literature.
        Patient Educ Couns. Feb 2012; 86 (Epub 2011 Jun 2. PMID: 21640543): 137-146https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2011.04.010
        • Millien VO
        • Mansour NM.
        Bowel preparation for colonoscopy in 2020: a look at the past, present, and future.
        Curr Gastroenterol Rep. May 6, 2020; 22 (PMID: 32377915): 28https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-020-00764-4
        • Johnson DA
        • Barkun AN
        • Cohen LB
        • et al.
        US Multi-society task force on colorectal cancer. Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: recommendations from the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer.
        Gastroenterology. Oct 2014; 147 (PMID: 25239068): 903-924https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2014.07.002
        • Fuccio L
        • Collatuzzo G
        • Frazzoni L
        • et al.
        Impact of colonoscopy on working productivity: a prospective multicenter observational study.
        Gastrointest Endosc. Mar 2022; 95 (e8): 550-561https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2021.11.039
        • Patel M
        • Staggs E
        • Thomas CS
        • Lukens F
        • Wallace M
        • Almansa C.
        Development and validation of the Mayo Clinic Bowel Prep Tolerability Questionnaire.
        Dig Liver Dis. Sep 2014; 46: 808-812https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2014.05.020
        • Barbara G
        • Stanghellini V
        • De Giorgio R
        • et al.
        Activated mast cells in proximity to colonic nerves correlate with abdominal pain in irritable bowel syndrome.
        Gastroenterology. 2004; 126: 693-702https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2003.11.055
        • Dothel G
        • Barbaro MR
        • Boudin H
        • et al.
        Nerve fiber outgrowth is increased in the intestinal mucosa of patients with irritable bowel syndrome.
        Gastroenterology. 2015; 148: 1002-1011https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2015.01.042
        • Derogatis LR
        • Melisaratos N.
        The Brief Symptom Inventory: an introduction report.
        Psychol Med. 1983; 13: 595-605
        • Apolone G
        • Mosconi P.
        The Italian SF-36 Health Survey: translation, validation and norming.
        J Clin Epidemiol. Nov 1998; 51: 1025-1036https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00094-8
        • Jakobsen JC
        • Gluud C
        • Wetterslev J
        • et al.
        When and how should multiple imputation be used for handling missing data in randomised clinical trials—a practical guide with flowcharts.
        BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2017; 17 (PMID: 29207961; PMCID: PMC5717805): 162https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0442-1
        • Sato K
        • Kuroda S
        • Owan H.
        Mental health effects of long work hours, night and weekend work, and short rest periods.
        Soc Sci Med. Feb 2020; 246 (Epub 2019 Dec 27)112774https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112774
        • StataCorp
        Stata Statistical Software: Release 16. College Station.
        StataCorp LLC, TX2019
        • Martel M
        • Barkun AN
        • Menard C
        • et al.
        Split-dose preparations are superior to day-before bowel cleansing regimens: a meta-analysis.
        Gastroenterology. Jul 2015; 149 (Epub 2015 Apr 8): 79-88https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2015.04.004
        • Bucci C
        • Rotondano G
        • Hassan C
        • et al.
        Optimal bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: split the dose! A series of meta-analyses of controlled studies.
        Gastrointest Endosc. Oct 2014; 80 (e2Epub 2014 Jul 19): 566-576https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2014.05.320
        • Sayuk GS
        • Elwing JE
        • Lustman PJ
        • et al.
        High somatic symptom burdens and functional gastrointestinal disorders.
        Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. May 2007; 5 (Epub 2007 Jan 26): 556-562https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2006.11.024
        • Lacy BE
        • Pimentel M
        • Brenner DM
        • et al.
        ACG clinical guideline: management of irritable bowel syndrome.
        Am J Gastroenterol. Jan 1, 2021; 116: 17-44https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000001036
        • Lieberman DA
        • Holub J
        • Eisen G
        • et al.
        Utilization of colonoscopy in the United States: results from a national consortium.
        Gastrointest Endosc. Dec, 2005; 62: 875-883https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2005.06.037
        • Rugulies R
        • Sørensen K
        • Di Tecco C
        • et al.
        The effect of exposure to long working hours on depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis from the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the work-related burden of disease and injury.
        Environ Int. Oct, 2021; 155 (Epub 2021 Jun 15)106629https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.106629
        • Park S
        • Kook H
        • Seok H
        • et al.
        The negative impact of long working hours on mental health in young Korean workers.
        PLoS One. Aug 4, 2020; 15e0236931https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236931
        • Peipins LA
        • Soman A
        • Berkowitz Z
        • et al.
        The lack of paid sick leave as a barrier to cancer screening and medical care-seeking: results from the National Health Interview Survey.
        BMC Public Health. Jul 12, 2012; 12: 520https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-520
        • Hassan C
        • East J
        • Radaelli F
        • et al.
        Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2019.
        Endoscopy. Aug, 2019; 51 (Epub 2019 Jul 11): 775-794https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0959-0505
        • Radaelli F
        • Paggi S
        • Hassan C
        • et al.
        Split-dose preparation for colonoscopy increases adenoma detection rate: a randomised controlled trial in an organised screening programme.
        Gut. 2017; 66: 270-277https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310685
        • Gu P
        • Lew D
        • Oh SJ
        • et al.
        Comparing the real-world effectiveness of competing colonoscopy preparations: results of a prospective trial.
        Am J Gastroenterol. Feb, 2019; 114: 305-314https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000000057
        • Sharma P
        • Burke CA
        • Johnson DA
        • et al.
        The importance of colonoscopy bowel preparation for the detection of colorectal lesions and colorectal cancer prevention.
        Endosc Int Open. May, 2020; 8 (Epub 2020 Apr 17): E673-E683https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1127-3144
        • Gandhi K
        • Tofani C
        • Sokach C
        • et al.
        Patient characteristics associated with quality of colonoscopy preparation: a systematic review and Meta-analysis.
        Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. Mar 2018; 16 (e10Epub 2017 Aug 18): 357-369https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2017.08.016