- Raine T.
- Bonovas S.
- Burisch J.
- et al.
- Orlando A.
- Armuzzi A.
- Papi C.
The Italian Society of Gastroenterology (SIGE) and the Italian Group for the study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IG-IBD) clinical practice guidelines: the use of tumor necrosis factor-alpha antagonist therapy in inflammatory bowel disease.
2.1 Consensus process for guidelines development
- –Setting 1: Induction of remission in adults with moderate to severe UC. This setting was divided into four sub-settings:
- –1A: Biologics or tofacitinib vs. no treatment in biologic-naïve patients
- –1B: Comparisons among drugs in biologic-naïve patients
- –1C: Biologics or tofacitinib vs. no treatment in biologic-experienced patients
- –1D: Comparisons among drugs in biologic-experienced patients.
- –Setting 2: Anti-TNF-based combination therapy for the induction of remission in adults with moderate to severe UC
- –Setting 3: Acute severe UC refractory to intravenous steroids
- –Setting 4: Maintenance of remission induced by biologics or tofacitinib
- –Setting 5: Optimization strategies and de-escalation of anti-TNF-based treatments.
2.2 Grading of the evidence and strength of recommendations
|Quality of evidence||Interpretation|
|High||We are very confident that the true effect lies close to the estimate of the effect.|
|Moderate||We are moderately confident in the effect estimate. The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of effect (even if it is possible that the true effect is different).|
|Low||Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited. The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of effect.|
|Very low||We have very little confidence in the effect estimate. The true effect is likely to be different from the estimate of effect.|
|Knowledge gap||There is insufficient evidence to determine the true effect.|
|Strength of recommendation||For patients||For clinicians|
|Most individuals in this situation would want the recommended course and only a small proportion would not.||Most individuals should receive the recommended course of action.|
|The majority of individuals in this situation would want the suggested course, but many would not.||Different choices will be appropriate for different patients.|
“IG-IBD makes no recommendation”
|–||The confidence in the effect estimate is so low that any effect estimate is speculative.|
2.3 Setting 1: induction of remission in adults with moderate to severe UC
2.3.1 1A: biologics or tofacitinib vs. no treatment in biologic-naïve patients
2.3.2 1B: comparisons among drugs in biologic-naïve patients
2.3.3 1C: biologics or tofacitinib vs. no treatment in biologic-experienced patients
2.3.4 1D: comparisons among drugs in biologic-experienced patients
2.4 Setting 2: anti-TNF-based combination therapy for the induction of remission in adults with moderate to severe UC
2.5 Setting 3: acute severe UC refractory to intravenous steroids
2.6 Setting 4: maintenance of remission induced by biologics or tofacitinib
2.7 Setting 5: optimization strategies and de-escalation of anti-TNF-based treatments
|Statements||Quality of evidence||Agreement rate||Panel comment beyond GRADE|
|1. For adults with moderate to severe UC refractory to conventional therapy who are naïve to biologics, IG-IBD recommends using infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, vedolizumab, ustekinumab or tofacitinib over no treatment to induce remission.||High-quality for infliximab and adalimumab; moderate-quality for vedolizumab and tofacitinib; low-quality for golimumab and ustekinumab||100%||The availability of low-cost biosimilars of infliximab and adalimumab – with proven, equivalent efficacy and safety to the originator products – reinforces the strength of the recommendation for these two biologics.|
|2. For adults with moderate to severe, active UC refractory to conventional therapy who are naïve to biologics, IG-IBD suggests using infliximab over adalimumab and golimumab for the induction of remission.||Very low-quality||100%|
|3. For adults with moderate to severe UC refractory to conventional therapy who are naïve to biologics, IG-IBD suggests using vedolizumab over adalimumab due to vedolizumab's superiority in maintaining remission.||Low-quality for induction of remission; moderate-quality for maintenance of remission||82%||The superiority of vedolizumab over adalimumab for maintaining remission was also found in a recent observational study.|
|4. For adults with moderate to severe UC refractory to conventional therapy who are naïve to biologics, IG-IBD makes no recommendation on the use of:|
- infliximab over vedolizumab, ustekinumab, or tofacitinib;
- adalimumab over golimumab, ustekinumab, or tofacitinib;
- golimumab over vedolizumab, ustekinumab, or tofacitinib;
- vedolizumab over ustekinumab or tofacitinib;
- ustekinumab over tofacinitib.
|Low- or very low-quality||86%||The lack of a recommendation regarding the choice between infliximab and tofacitinib is based on data at induction only. However, the reported superiority of tofacitinib for the maintenance of remission should be interpreted with caution, as it is derived from an indirect comparison, and the real-world experience with tofacitinib is currently limited.|
The lack of a recommendation on the choice between ustekinumab and tofacitinib is based on data at induction only. However, the superiority of ustekinumab over tofacitinib for the maintenance of remission should be interpreted with caution.
|5. For adults with moderate to severe, active UC refractory to at least one anti-TNF agent, IG-IBD makes no recommendation in favor of or against using infliximab or golimumab to induce remission.||Knowledge gap||68%||The 15-year clinical experience with infliximab and demonstration of this drug's efficacy in observational studies suggest that it may also be effective in patients in whom previous treatment with a different anti-TNF agent was unsuccessful. Clinical experience with golimumab is more limited, but there is evidence from observational studies of a clinical benefit in this setting.|
|6. For adults with moderate to severe UC refractory to at least one anti-TNF agent, IG-IBD suggests against using adalimumab or vedolizumab to induce remission.||Low-quality||45%||There is a clinical perception and evidence from observational studies that a substantial proportion of patients previously found to be unresponsive to an anti-TNF drug have a clinical benefit with vedolizumab as a second-line agent. Similar considerations can be made for adalimumab as a second-line agent.|
|7. For adults with moderate to severe UC refractory to at least one biologic, IG-IBD recommends using tofacitinib or ustekinumab for the induction of remission.||Moderate-quality for tofacitinib; low-quality for ustekinumab||91%||Robust real-world studies are needed to confirm the data from randomized controlled trials. In addition, the profiles of the ideal patient to be treated differ for the two drugs: tofacitinib should not be used in patients with thrombotic or cardiovascular risk factors, while ustekinumab is also indicated for frail patients due its safety profile.|
|8. For adults with moderate to severe UC refractory to therapy with at least one biologic, IG-IBD makes no recommendation on the use of:|
- infliximab over adalimumab, golimumab, vedolizumab, tofacitinib or ustekinumab;
- adalimumab over golimumab;
- golimumab over vedolizumab, tofacitinib, or ustekinumab.
|9. For adults with moderate to severe UC refractory to therapy with at least one biologic, IG-IBD makes no recommendation on the use of adalimumab over vedolizumab or on the use of tofacitinib over ustekinumab.||Very low-quality||91%|
|10. For adults with moderate to severe UC refractory to at least one biologic, IG-IBD suggests using tofacitinib or ustekinumab over adalimumab or vedolizumab.||Very low-quality||55%|
|11. For adults with moderate to severe UC refractory to conventional therapy, IG-IBD suggests using combination therapy with infliximab plus an immunosuppressant rather than infliximab monotherapy for the induction of remission.||Low-quality||55%||This recommendation arises from only one study. It should be noted that the primary endpoint of the study was set at 16 weeks. Therefore, the period of observation is limited, and there are safety concerns regarding prolonged combination therapy|
|12. For adults with moderate to severe UC refractory to conventional therapy, IG-IBD makes no recommendation on using combination therapy with adalimumab plus an immunosuppressant vs. adalimumab monotherapy for the induction of remission.||Knowledge gap||95%|
|13. For adults with acute severe UC refractory to intravenous steroids, IG-IBD makes no recommendation on using infliximab vs. cyclosporine.||Very low-quality||95%||Only one rescue therapy line (with infliximab or cyclosporine) should be attempted. A second rescue therapy poses significant safety problems with a higher mortality risk and is generally not recommended. However, it may be occasionally considered in selected cases at tertiary referral centers.|
|14. For adults with UC who achieved remission with infliximab, adalimumab, vedolizumab, ustekinumab or tofacitinib, IG-IBD recommends using the same drug as maintenance treatment.||High-quality for infliximab; moderate-quality for adalimumab, vedolizumab, ustekinumab, and tofacitinib||100%|
|15. For adults with UC who achieved remission with golimumab, IG-IBD makes no recommendation on using golimumab as maintenance therapy.||Low-quality||55%||The failure to recommend golimumab as maintenance therapy resulted from the strict critical outcomes used to assess efficacy. However, it is reasonable to continue golimumab as a maintenance treatment in those cases of successful induction with golimumab.|
|16. For adults with moderate to severe UC, IG-IBD makes no recommendation on using an anti-TNF agent plus an immunosuppressant vs. anti-TNF monotherapy as maintenance treatment.||Very low-quality evidence for infliximab; knowledge gap for adalimumab and golimumab||86%|
|17. For adults with moderate to severe UC, IG-IBD makes no recommendation on using an anti-TNF agent plus an immunosuppressant vs. immunosuppressant monotherapy as maintenance treatment.||Knowledge gap||82%|
|18. For adults with UC who lost the response to anti-TNF agents, IG-IBD makes no recommendation on using therapeutic drug monitoring or a standard symptom-based approach of dose optimization.||Knowledge gap||86%|
|19. For adults with UC who lost the response to anti-TNF agents and do not respond to dose escalation, IG-IBD makes no recommendation on using an anti-TNF agent plus an immunosuppressant or making a therapeutic change.||Knowledge gap||82%||Therapeutic drug monitoring, when available, can be considered a useful tool to drive therapeutic choices in case of non-response or loss of response with anti-TNF agents.|
|20. For adults with UC who achieved long-term deep remission, IG-IBD makes no recommendation about the withdrawal of anti-TNF treatment.||Very low-quality||100%||This possibility should be assessed on a case-by-case basis and discussed with the patient. In case of withdrawal, remission can be maintained with 5-aminosalicylates or thiopurines. However, the higher rate of clinical remission in patients who continue anti-TNF treatment and the risk of relapse in cases of discontinuation should always be considered.|
Conflict of interest
- Ulcerative colitis.Lancet. 2017; 389: 1756-1770
- Natural history of adult ulcerative colitis in population-based cohorts: a systematic review.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018; 16: 343-356
- The biologics of ulcerative colitis.Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2017; 17: 175-184
- Vedolizumab for inflammatory bowel disease: from randomized controlled trials to real-life evidence.World J Gastroenterol. 2018; 24: 2457-2467
- Ustekinumab in the management of Crohn's disease: expert opinion.Dig Liver Dis. 2018; 50: 653-660
- Effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab for the treatment of Crohn's disease in real-life experiences: a meta-analysis of observational studies.Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2020; 20: 193-203
- Effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib for the treatment of ulcerative colitis: a single-arm meta-analysis of observational studies.Dig Liver Dis. 2021; (May 16S1590-8658(21)00203-6)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2021.04.018
- AGA Clinical practice guidelines on the management of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis.Gastroenterology. 2020; 158: 1450-1461
- ECCO guidelines on therapeutics in ulcerative colitis: medical treatment.J Crohns Colitis. 2021; (Oct 12): jjab178https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab178
- The Italian Society of Gastroenterology (SIGE) and the Italian Group for the study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IG-IBD) clinical practice guidelines: the use of tumor necrosis factor-alpha antagonist therapy in inflammatory bowel disease.Dig Liver Dis. 2011; 43: 1-20
- GRADE hand-book for grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.The GRADE Working Group, 2013 (https://gdt.gradepro.org/app/handbook/handbook.html)
- Use of biologics and small molecule drugs for the management of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis: IG-IBD technical review based on the GRADE methodology.Dig Liver Dis. 2022; (IN PRESS)
- Going from evidence to recommendations.BMJ. 2008; 336: 1049-1051
- The PROSIT cohort of infliximab biosimilar in IBD: a prolonged follow-up on the effectiveness and safety across Italy.Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2019; 25: 568-579
- The SPOSIB SB2 sicilian cohort: safety and effectiveness of infliximab biosimilar SB2 in inflammatory bowel diseases, including multiple switches.Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2021; 27: 182-189
- SPOSAB ABP 501: a sicilian prospective observational study of patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with adalimumab biosimilar ABP 501.J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021; 36: 3041-3049
- A propensity score weighted comparison of vedolizumab, adalimumab, and golimumab in patients with ulcerative colitis.Dig Liver Dis. 2020; 52: 1461-1466
- Systematic review: infliximab therapy in ulcerative colitis.Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007; 25: 19-37
- Outcome in ulcerative colitis after switch from adalimumab/golimumab to infliximab: a multicenter retrospective study.Dig Liver Dis. 2019; 51: 510-515
- Two-year effectiveness and safety of golimumab in ulcerative colitis: an IG-IBD study.United Eur Gastroenterol J. 2021; 9: 102-109
- Clinical outcomes of golimumab as first, second or third anti-TNF agent in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis.Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2017; 23: 1394-1402
- Vedolizumab for ulcerative colitis: treatment outcomes from the VICTORY Consortium.Am J Gastroenterol. 2018; 113: 1345
- The real-world effectiveness of vedolizumab on intestinal and articular outcomes in inflammatory bowel diseases.Dig Liver Dis. 2018; 50: 675-681
- Comparative efficacy and safety of vedolizumab and infliximab in ulcerative colitis after failure of a first subcutaneous anti-TNF agent: a multicentre cohort study.Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020; 51: 852-860
- Systematic review with meta-analysis: the efficacy of a second anti-TNF in patients with inflammatory bowel disease whose previous anti-TNF treatment has failed.Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015; 41: 613-623
- Adalimumab in active ulcerative colitis: a "real-life" observational study.Dig Liver Dis. 2013; 45: 738-743
- Systematic review with meta-analysis: comparative risk of lymphoma with anti-tumour necrosis factor agents and/or thiopurines in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020; 52: 1289-1297
- Comparative risk of serious infections with biologic and/or immunosuppressive therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020; 18 (e3): 69-81
- GETAID. Successive treatment with cyclosporine and infliximab in steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis.Am J Gastroenterol. 2011; 106: 771-777
- Outcomes of rescue therapy in acute severe ulcerative colitis: data from the United Kingdom inflammatory bowel disease audit.Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013; 38: 935-945
- Delayed surgery for acute severe colitis is associated with increased risk of postoperative complications.Br J Surg. 2010; 97: 404-409
- A comprehensive literature review and expert consensus statement on therapeutic drug monitoring of biologics in inflammatory bowel disease.Am J Gastroenterol. 2021; 116: 2014-2025
- Discontinuation of infliximab in patients with ulcerative colitis is associated with increased risk of relapse: a multinational retrospective cohort study.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016; 14 (e1): 1426-1432
- Thiopurine monotherapy is effective in ulcerative colitis but significantly less so in Crohn's disease: long-term outcomes for 11 928 patients in the UK inflammatory bowel disease bioresource.Gut. 2021; 70: 677-686
Edited by Roberto de Franchis.
User LicenseCreative Commons Attribution – NonCommercial – NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) |
For non-commercial purposes:
- Read, print & download
- Redistribute or republish the final article
- Text & data mine
- Translate the article (private use only, not for distribution)
- Reuse portions or extracts from the article in other works
- Sell or re-use for commercial purposes
- Distribute translations or adaptations of the article
Elsevier's open access license policy