Advertisement
Oncology| Volume 54, ISSUE 4, P537-542, April 2022

Download started.

Ok

Risk of developing metachronous colorectal neoplasia after the resection of proximal versus distal adenomas

  • Yoon Suk Jung
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author.
    Affiliations
    Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 29, Saemunan-Ro, Jongno-Gu, Seoul 03181, Korea
    Search for articles by this author
  • Nam Hee Kim
    Affiliations
    Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 29, Saemunan-Ro, Jongno-Gu, Seoul 03181, Korea
    Search for articles by this author
  • Youngwoo Kim
    Affiliations
    Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 29, Saemunan-Ro, Jongno-Gu, Seoul 03181, Korea
    Search for articles by this author
  • Dong Il Park
    Affiliations
    Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 29, Saemunan-Ro, Jongno-Gu, Seoul 03181, Korea
    Search for articles by this author
Published:August 22, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2021.08.005

      Abstract

      Background

      Current post-polypectomy guidelines do not consider adenoma location. We compared the risk of metachronous colorectal neoplasia (CRN) according to adenoma location.

      Methods

      We collected data from 9710 patients who underwent follow-up colonoscopy after adenoma removal. Patients were classified according to baseline adenoma location: distal only (n=4665), proximal only (n=3827), and both sides (n=1218).

      Results

      The risk of metachronous CRN in patients with proximal only adenomas was higher than that in those with distal only adenomas (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]=1.12, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.04–1.21), while the risk of metachronous advanced CRN (ACRN) was not different between the two groups. Among patients aged <50 years, the risk of metachronous CRN in those with proximal only non-advanced adenomas (NAAs) was higher than that in those with only distal NAAs, while among patients aged ≥ 50 years, the risk in those with proximal only advanced adenomas (AAs) was higher than that in those with distal only AAs. However, the risk of metachronous ACRN did not differ based on adenoma location in patients aged < 50 and ≥ 50 years.

      Conclusions

      Proximal adenoma was associated with an increased risk of metachronous CRN, but not with an increased risk of metachronous ACRN, supporting the current guidelines recommending the same surveillance interval for distal and proximal adenoma without discrimination by adenoma location.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Digestive and Liver Disease
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Wong M.C.
        • Ding H.
        • Wang J.
        • et al.
        Prevalence and risk factors of colorectal cancer in Asia.
        Intest Res. 2019; 17: 317-329
        • Rex D.K.
        • Boland C.R.
        • Dominitz J.A.
        • et al.
        Colorectal cancer screening: recommendations for physicians and patients from the U.S. multi-society task force on colorectal cancer.
        Am J Gastroenterol. 2017; 112: 1016-1030
        • Sachdev R.
        • Sao R.
        • Birk J.W.
        • et al.
        Update in surveillance recommendations in individuals with conventional adenomas.
        Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2019; 17: 303-312
        • Gupta S.
        • Lieberman D.
        • Anderson J.C.
        • et al.
        Recommendations for follow-up after colonoscopy and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer.
        Am J Gastroenterol. 2020; 115: 415-434
        • Rutter M.D.
        • East J.
        • Rees C.J.
        • et al.
        British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland/Public Health England post-polypectomy and post-colorectal cancer resection surveillance guidelines.
        Gut. 2020; 69: 201-223
        • Gupta S.
        • Jacobs E.T.
        • Baron J.A.
        • et al.
        Risk stratification of individuals with low-risk colorectal adenomas using clinical characteristics: a pooled analysis.
        Gut. 2017; 66: 446-453
        • Laiyemo A.O.
        • Murphy G.
        • Albert P.S.
        • et al.
        Postpolypectomy colonoscopy surveillance guidelines: predictive accuracy for advanced adenoma at 4 years.
        Ann Intern Med. 2008; 148: 419-426
        • van Heijningen E.M.
        • Lansdorp-Vogelaar I.
        • Kuipers E.J.
        • et al.
        Features of adenoma and colonoscopy associated with recurrent colorectal neoplasia based on a large community-based study.
        Gastroenterology. 2013; 144: 1410-1418
        • Lee T.J.
        • Nickerson C.
        • Goddard A.F.
        • et al.
        Outcome of 12-month surveillance colonoscopy in high-risk patients in the National Health Service Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.
        Colorectal Dis. 2013; 15: e435-e442
        • Baik S.J.
        • Park H.
        • Park J.J.
        • et al.
        Advanced colonic neoplasia at follow-up colonoscopy according to risk components and adenoma location at index colonoscopy: a retrospective study of 1,974 Asymptomatic Koreans.
        Gut Liver. 2017; 11: 667-673
        • Kim N.H.
        • Jung Y.S.
        • Lee M.Y.
        • et al.
        Risk of developing metachronous advanced colorectal neoplasia after polypectomy in patients with multiple diminutive or small adenomas.
        Am J Gastroenterol. 2019; 114: 1657-1664
        • Jung Y.S.
        • Ryu S.
        • Chang Y.
        • et al.
        Risk factors for colorectal neoplasia in persons aged 30 to 39 years and 40 to 49 years.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2015; 81 (e7): 637-645
        • Crockett S.D.
        • Nagtegaal I.D.
        Terminology, Molecular features, epidemiology, and management of serrated colorectal neoplasia.
        Gastroenterology. 2019; 157 (e4): 949-966
        • Kim S.Y.
        • Kim T.I.
        Serrated neoplasia pathway as an alternative route of colorectal cancer carcinogenesis.
        Intest Res. 2018; 16: 358-365
        • Koestler D.C.
        • Li J.
        • Baron J.A.
        • et al.
        Distinct patterns of DNA methylation in conventional adenomas involving the right and left colon.
        Mod Pathol. 2014; 27: 145-155
        • Kim K.
        • Castro E.J.T.
        • Shim H.
        • et al.
        Differences regarding the molecular features and gut microbiota between right and left colon cancer.
        Ann Coloproctol. 2018; 34: 280-285
        • Pohl H.
        • Robertson D.J.
        • Mott L.A.
        • et al.
        Association between adenoma location and risk of recurrence.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2016; 84: 709-716
        • Zhao S.
        • Wang S.
        • Pan P.
        • et al.
        Magnitude, risk factors, and factors associated with adenoma miss rate of tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Gastroenterology. 2019; 156 (e11): 1661-1674
        • Lee J.
        • Park S.W.
        • Kim Y.S.
        • et al.
        Risk factors of missed colorectal lesions after colonoscopy.
        Med (Baltim). 2017; 96: e7468
        • Shin J.G.
        • Kim H.W.
        • Park S.B.
        • et al.
        Polyp missing rate and its associated risk factors of referring hospitals for endoscopic resection of advanced colorectal neoplasia.
        Med (Baltim). 2017; 96: e6742
        • Huang Y.
        • Gong W.
        • Su B.
        • et al.
        Recurrence and surveillance of colorectal adenoma after polypectomy in a southern Chinese population.
        J Gastroenterol. 2010; 45: 838-845
        • Huang Y.
        • Li X.
        • Wang Z.
        • et al.
        Five-year risk of colorectal neoplasia after normal baseline colonoscopy in asymptomatic Chinese Mongolian over 50 years of age.
        Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012; 27: 1651-1656
        • Jang H.W.
        • Park S.J.
        • Hong S.P.
        • et al.
        Risk factors for recurrent high-risk polyps after the removal of high-risk polyps at initial colonoscopy.
        Yonsei Med J. 2015; 56: 1559-1565
        • Lee J.L.
        • Cha J.M.
        • Lee H.M.
        • et al.
        Determining the optimal surveillance interval after a colonoscopic polypectomy for the Korean population?.
        Intest Res. 2017; 15: 109-117
        • Atkin W.
        • Wooldrage K.
        • Brenner A.
        • et al.
        Adenoma surveillance and colorectal cancer incidence: a retrospective, multicentre, cohort study.
        Lancet Oncol. 2017; 18: 823-834
        • Click B.
        • Pinsky P.F.
        • Hickey T.
        • et al.
        Association of colonoscopy adenoma findings with long-term colorectal cancer incidence.
        JAMA. 2018; 319: 2021-2031