Advertisement
Digestive Endoscopy| Volume 51, ISSUE 11, P1557-1561, November 2019

Download started.

Ok

EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections using lumen apposing metal stents: An international, multicenter experience

      Abstract

      Introduction

      Lumen apposing metal stents (LAMS) have been used increasingly for drainage of pancreatic fluid collections (PFC). We present an international, multicenter study evaluating the safety and efficacy of LAMS in PFCs.

      Methods

      Consecutive patients undergoing LAMS placement for PFC at 12 international centers were included (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01522573). Demographics, clinical history, and procedural details were recorded. Technical success was defined as successful LAMS deployment. Clinical success was defined as PFC resolution at three-month follow-up.

      Results

      192 patients were included (140 males (72.9%), mean-age 53.8 years), with mean follow-up of 4.2 months ± 3.8. Mean PFC size was 11.9 cm (range 2–25). The median number of endoscopic interventions was 2 (range 1–14). Etiologies for PFC were gallstone (n = 82, 42.7%), alcohol (n = 50, 26%), idiopathic (n = 26, 13.5%), and other (n = 34, 17.7%). Technical success was achieved in 189 patients (98.4%). Clinical success was observed in 125 of 135 patients (92.6%).
      Adverse events included bleeding (n = 11, 5.7), infection (n = 2, 1%), and perforation (n = 2, 1%). Three or more endoscopy sessions were a positive predictor for PFC resolution and the only significant predictor for AEs.

      Conclusion

      LAMS has a high technical and clinical success rate with a low rate of AEs. PFC drainage via LAMS provides a minimally invasive, safe, and efficacious procedure for PFC resolution.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Digestive and Liver Disease
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Poornachandra K.S.
        • Bhasin D.K.
        • Nagi B.
        • Sinha S.K.
        • Rana S.S.
        • Shafiq N.
        • et al.
        Clinical, biochemical, and radiologic parameters at admission predicting formation of a pseudocyst in acute pancreatitis.
        J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011; 45: 159-163https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181dd9d14
        • Banks P.A.
        • Bollen T.L.
        • Dervenis C.
        • Gooszen H.G.
        • Johnson C.D.
        • Sarr M.G.
        • et al.
        Classification of acute pancreatitis—2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus.
        Gut. 2013; 62: 102-111https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779
        • Muniraj T.
        • Jamidar P.
        • Nealon W.
        • Aslanian H.
        Endoscopic management of pancreatic fluid collections.
        J Clin Gastroenterol. 2016; ([Epub ahead of print])
        • Binmoeller K.F.
        • Seifert H.
        • Walter A.
        • Soehendra N.
        Transpapillary and transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 1995; 42: 219-224https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5107(95)70095-1
        • Siddiqui A.A.
        • Adler D.G.
        • Nieto J.
        • Shah J.N.
        • Binmoeller K.F.
        • Kane S.
        • et al.
        EUS-guided drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections and necrosis by using a novel lumen-apposing stent: a large retrospective, multicenter U.S. experience (with videos).
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2016; 83: 699-707https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2015.10.020
        • Baron T.H.
        • Harewood G.C.
        • Morgan D.E.
        • Yates M.R.
        Outcome differences after endoscopic drainage of pancreatic necrosis, acute pancreatic pseudocysts, and chronic pancreatic pseudocysts.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2002; 56: 7-17https://doi.org/10.1067/mge.2002.125106
        • Varadarajulu S.
        • Rana S.S.
        • Bhasin D.K.
        Endoscopic therapy for pancreatic duct leaks and disruptions.
        Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2013; 23: 863-892https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giec.2013.06.008
        • Varadarajulu S.
        • Bang J.Y.
        • Phadnis M.A.
        • Christein J.D.
        • Wilcox C.M.
        Endoscopic transmural drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections: outcomes and predictors of treatment success in 211 consecutive patients.
        J Gastrointest Surg. 2011; 15: 2080
        • Shah R.J.
        • Shah J.N.
        • Waxman I.
        • Kowalski T.E.
        • Sanchez-Yague A.
        • Nieto J.
        • et al.
        Safety and efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections with lumen-apposing covered self-expanding metal stents.
        Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015; 13: 747-752https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2014.09.047
        • Raijman I.
        Biliary and pancreatic stents.
        Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2003; 13: 561-592
        • Varadarajulu S.
        • Christein J.D.
        • Wilcox C.M.
        Frequency of complications during EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections in 148 consecutive patients.
        J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011; 26: 1504-1508
        • Beckingham I.J.
        • Krige J.E.
        • Bornman P.C.
        • Terblanche J.
        Endoscopic management of pancreatic pseudocysts.
        Br J Surg. 1997; 84: 1638-1645
        • Parks R.W.
        • Tzovaras G.
        • Diamond T.
        • Rowlands B.J.
        Management of pancreatic pseudocysts.
        Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2000; 82: 383-387
        • Tyberg A.
        • Karia K.
        • Gabr M.
        • Desai A.
        • Doshi R.
        • Gaidhane M.
        • et al.
        Management of pancreatic fluid collections: a comprehensive review of the literature.
        World J Gastroenterol. 2016; 22: 2256-2270https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i7.2256
        • Itoi T.
        • Binmoeller K.F.
        • Shah J.
        • Sofuni A.
        • Itokawa F.
        • Kurihara T.
        • et al.
        Clinical evaluation of a novel lumen-apposing metal stent for endosonography-guided pancreatic pseudocyst and gallbladder drainage (with videos).
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 75: 870-876https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2011.10.020
        • Romagnuolo J.
        • Cotton P.B.
        • Eisen G.
        • Vargo J.
        • Petersen B.T.
        Identifying and reporting risk factors for adverse events in endoscopy. Part I: cardiopulmonary events.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 73: 579-585
        • Romagnuolo J.
        • Cotton P.B.
        • Eisen G.
        • Vargo J.
        • Petersen B.T.
        Identifying and reporting risk factors for adverse events in endoscopy. Part II: noncardiopulmonary events.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 73: 586-597
        • Rinninella E.
        • Kunda R.
        • Dollhopf M.
        • Sanchez-Yague A.
        • Will U.
        • Tarantino I.
        • et al.
        EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections using a novel lumen-apposing metal stent on an electrocautery-enhanced delivery system: a large retrospective study (with video).
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2015; 82: 1039-1046https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2015.04.006
        • Varadarajulu S.
        • Christein J.D.
        • Wilcox C.M.
        • Varadarajulu S.
        • Christein J.D.
        • Wilcox C.M.
        Frequency of complications during EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections in 148 consecutive patients.
        J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011; 26: 1504-1508
        • Talreja J.P.
        • Shami V.M.
        • Ku J.
        • Morris T.D.
        • Ellen K.
        • Kahaleh M.
        Transenteric drainage of pancreatic-fluid collections with fully covered self-expanding metallic stents (with video).
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 68: 1199-1203
        • Giovannini M.
        Cystogastrotomy entirely performed under endosonography guidance for pancreatic pseudocyst: results in six patients.
        1998: 200-203
        • Panamonta N.
        • Ngamruengphong S.
        • Kijsirichareanchai K.
        • Nugent K.
        • Rakvit A.
        Endoscopic ultrasound-guided versus conventional transmural techniques have comparable treatment outcomes in draining pancreatic pseudocysts.
        Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012; 24: 1355-1362https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0b013e32835871eb
        • Walter D.
        • Will U.
        • Sanchez-Yague A.
        • Brenke D.
        • Hampe J.
        • Wollny H.
        • et al.
        A novel lumen-apposing metal stent for endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: a prospective cohort study.
        Endoscopy. 2015; 47: 63-67
        • Sharaiha R.Z.
        • Tyberg A.
        • Khashab M.A.
        • Kumta N.A.
        • Karia K.
        • Nieto J.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic therapy with lumen-apposing metal stents is safe and effective for patients with pancreatic walled-off necrosis.
        Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016; : 1-7https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2016.05.011
        • Saumoy M.
        • Kahaleh M.
        Progress in endoscopic ultrasonography: training in therapeutic or interventional endoscopic ultrasonography.
        Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2017; 27: 749-758https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giec.2017.06.012