Advertisement
Liver, Pancreas and Biliary Tract| Volume 51, ISSUE 11, P1574-1579, November 2019

Download started.

Ok

Concordance, intra- and inter-observer agreements between light microscopy and whole slide imaging for samples acquired by EUS in pancreatic solid lesions

      Abstract

      Background

      No study has compared the performance of light microscopy (LM) and whole slide imaging (WSI) for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) histological acquired tissue samples from pancreatic solid lesions (PSLs). We evaluated the concordance between LM and WSI and the inter- and intra-observer agreements among pathologists on PSLs EUS acquired samples.

      Methods

      LM and WSI from 60 patients with PSLs were evaluated by five expert pathologists to define: diagnostic classification, presence of a core, number and percentage of lesional cells. Washout period between evaluations was 3 months. Time of the procedures was also assessed.

      Results

      Forty-eight cell-block and 12 biopsy samples were evaluated. A high concordance between LM and WSI was found. Inter- and intra-observer agreements for diagnostic classification were substantial and complete, respectively. For all the other parameters, the inter-observer agreement was usually higher for LM. For the intra-observer, a substantial agreement was reached regarding the presence of tissue core and the number and the percentage of malignant cells. Median time for performing LM was significantly shorter than for WSI (p < 0.0001).

      Conclusions

      LM and WSI of cell-block and biopsy samples acquired by EUS in PSLs were highly concordant, with a substantial inter-observer and a complete intra-observer agreements regarding diagnostic classification.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Digestive and Liver Disease
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Weinstein R.S.
        • Graham A.R.
        • Lian F.
        • Braunhut B.L.
        • Barker G.R.
        • Krupinski E.A.
        • et al.
        Reconciliation of diverse telepathology system designs. Historic issues and implications for emerging markets and new applications.
        APMIS. 2012; 120: 256-275
        • Al-Janabi S.
        • Huisman A.
        • Van Diest P.J.
        Digital pathology: current status and future perspectives.
        Histopathology. 2012; 61: 1-9
        • Gilbertson J.
        • Yagi Y.
        Histology, imaging and new diagnostic work-flows in pathology.
        Diagn Pathol. 2008; 3: S14
        • Aeffner F.
        • Blanchard T.W.
        • Keel M.K.
        • Williams B.H.
        Whole-slide imaging: the future is here.
        Vet Pathol. 2018; 55: 488-489
        • Farahani N.
        • Pantanowitz L.
        Overview of Telepathology.
        Clin Lab Med. 2016; 36: 101-112
        • Farris A.B.
        • Cohen C.
        • Rogers T.E.
        • Smith G.H.
        Whole slide imaging for analytical anatomic pathology and telepathology: practical applications today, promises, and perils.
        Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2017; 141: 542-550
        • Hardy L.B.
        • Fitzgibbons P.L.
        • Goldsmith J.D.
        • Eisen R.N.
        • Beasley M.B.
        • Souers R.J.
        • et al.
        Immunohistochemistry validation procedures and practices: a College of American Pathologists survey of 727 laboratories.
        Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2013; 137: 19-25
        • Wolff A.C.
        • Hammond M.E.H.
        • Allison K.H.
        • Harvey B.E.
        • Mangu P.B.
        • Bartlett J.M.S.
        • et al.
        Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast Cancer: American society of clinical oncology/college of American pathologists clinical practice guideline focused update.
        Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2018; 142: 1364-1382
        • Bejnordi B.E.
        • Zuidhof G.
        • Balkenhol M.
        • Hermsen M.
        • Bult P.
        • van Ginneken B.
        • et al.
        Context-aware stacked convolutional neural networks for classification of breast carcinomas in whole-slide histopathology images.
        J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2017; 4: 044504
        • Maeda I.
        • Kubota M.
        • Ohta J.
        • Shinno K.
        • Tajima S.
        • Ariizumi Y.
        • et al.
        Effectiveness of computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) of breast pathology using immunohistochemistry results of core needle biopsy samples for synaptophysin, oestrogen receptor and CK14/p63 for classification of epithelial proliferative lesions of the breast.
        J Clin Pathol. 2017; 70: 1057-1062
        • Aeffner F.
        • Martin N.T.
        • Peljto M.
        • Black J.C.
        • Major J.K.
        • Jangani M.
        • et al.
        Quantitative assessment of pancreatic cancer precursor lesions in IHC-stained tissue with a tissue image analysis platform.
        Lab Invest. 2016; 96: 1327-1336
        • Yoshida H.
        • Yamashita Y.
        • Shimazu T.
        • Cosatto E.
        • Kiyuna T.
        • Taniguchi H.
        • et al.
        Automated histological classification of whole slide images of colorectal biopsy specimens.
        Oncotarget. 2017; 8: 90719-90729
        • Lam A.K.
        • Leung M.
        Whole-slide imaging for esophageal adenocarcinoma.
        Methods Mol Biol. 2018; 1756: 135-142
        • Camparo P.
        • Egevad L.
        • Algaba F.
        • Berney D.M.
        • Boccon-Gibod L.
        • Comperat E.
        • et al.
        Utility of whole slide imaging and virtual microscopy in prostate pathology.
        APMIS. 2012; 120: 298-304
        • Leo P.
        • Lee G.
        • Shih N.N.
        • Elliott R.
        • Feldman M.D.
        • Madabhushi A.
        Evaluating stability of histomorphometric features across scanner and staining variations: prostate cancer diagnosis from whole slide images.
        J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2016; 3: 047502
        • Kinoshita Y.
        • Watanabe K.
        • Ishii H.
        • Kushima H.
        • Fujita M.
        • Nabeshima K.
        Proliferation of elastic fibres in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a whole-slide image analysis and comparison with pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis.
        Histopathology. 2017; 71: 934-942
        • Shah K.K.
        • Lehman J.S.
        • Gibson L.E.
        • Lohse C.M.
        • Comfere N.I.
        • Wieland C.N.
        Validation of diagnostic accuracy with whole-slide imaging compared with glass slide review in dermatopathology.
        J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016; 75: 1229-1237
        • Gilbertson J.R.
        • Ho J.
        • Anthony L.
        • Jukic D.M.
        • Yagi Y.
        • Parwani A.V.
        Primary histologic diagnosis using automated whole slide imaging: a validation study.
        BMC Clin Pathol. 2006; 6: 4
        • Li X.
        • Liu J.
        • Xu H.
        • Gong E.
        • McNutt M.A.
        • Li F.
        • et al.
        A feasibility study of virtual slides in surgical pathology in China.
        Hum Pathol. 2007; 38: 1842-1848
        • Mukhopadhyay S.
        • Feldman M.D.
        • Abels E.
        • Ashfaq R.
        • Beltaifa S.
        • Cacciabeve N.G.
        • et al.
        Whole slide imaging versus microscopy for primary diagnosis in surgical pathology: a multicenter blinded randomized Noninferiority study of 1992 cases (pivotal study).
        Am J Surg Pathol. 2018; 42: 39-52
        • Vergani A.
        • Regis B.
        • Jocolle G.
        • Patetta R.
        • Rossi G.
        Noninferiority diagnostic value, but also economic and turnaround time advantages from digital pathology.
        Am J Surg Pathol. 2018; 42: 841-842
        • Boyce B.F.
        An update on the validation of whole slide imaging systems following FDA approval of a system for a routine pathology diagnostic service in the United States.
        Biotech Histochem. 2017; 92: 381-389
        • Evans A.J.
        • Bauer T.W.
        • Bui M.M.
        • Cornish T.C.
        • Duncan H.
        • Glassy E.F.
        • et al.
        US food and drug administration approval of whole slide imaging for primary diagnosis: a key milestone is reached and new questions are raised.
        Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2018; 142: 1383-1387
        • Dumonceau J.M.
        • Deprez P.H.
        • Jenssen C.
        • Iglesias-Garcia J.
        • Larghi A.
        • Vanbiervliet G.
        • et al.
        Indications, results, and clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline — Updated January 2017.
        Endoscopy. 2017; 49: 695-714
        • Erickson R.A.
        • Sayage-Rabie L.
        • Beissner R.S.
        Factors predicting the number of EUS-guided fine-needle passes for diagnosis of pancreatic malignancies.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2000; 51: 184-190
        • Jhala N.C.
        • Jhala D.N.
        • Chhieng D.C.
        • Eloubeidi M.A.
        • Eltoum I.A.
        Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. A cytopathologist’s perspective.
        Am J Clin Pathol. 2003; 120: 351-367
        • Khurana K.K.
        • Graber B.
        • Wang D.
        • Roy A.
        Telecytopathology for on-site adequacy evaluation decreases the nondiagnostic rate in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic lesions.
        Telemed J E Health. 2014; 20: 822-827
        • Marotti J.D.
        • Johncox V.
        • Ng D.
        • Gonzalez J.L.
        • Padmanabhan V.
        Implementation of telecytology for immediate assessment of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirations compared to conventional on-site evaluation: analysis of 240 consecutive cases.
        Acta Cytol. 2012; 56: 548-553
        • Bang J.Y.
        • Hebert-Magee S.
        • Navaneethan U.
        • Hasan M.K.
        • Hawes R.
        • Varadarajulu S.
        Randomized trial comparing the Franseen and Fork-tip needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2018; 87: 1432-1438
        • Rimbas M.
        • Crino S.F.
        • Gasbarrini A.
        • Costamagna G.
        • Scarpa A.
        • Larghi A.
        EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition for solid pancreatic lesions: finally moving from fine-needle aspiration to fine-needle biopsy?.
        Endosc Ultrasound. 2018; 7: 137-140
        • Pitman Bishop M.
        • Layfield L.
        The papanicolau society of cytopathology system for reporting pancreatobiliary cytology.
        Springer, 2015
        • Mitri R.D.
        • Rimbas M.
        • Attili F.
        • Fabbri C.
        • Carrara S.
        • Di Maurizio L.
        • et al.
        Performance of a new needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy in patients with pancreatic solid lesions: a retrospective multicenter study.
        Endosc Ultrasound. 2018; 7: 329-334
        • Mroz P.
        • Parwani A.V.
        • Kulesza P.
        Central pathology review for phase III clinical trials: the enabling effect of virtual microscopy.
        Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2013; 137: 492-495
        • Hipp J.D.
        • Lucas D.R.
        • Emmert-Buck M.R.
        • Compton C.C.
        • Balis U.J.
        Digital slide repositories for publications: lessons learned from the microarray community.
        Am J Surg Pathol. 2011; 35: 783-786
        • Goacher E.
        • Randell R.
        • Williams B.
        • Treanor D.
        The diagnostic concordance of whole slide imaging and light microscopy: a systematic review.
        Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2017; 141: 151-161
        • Chantziantoniou N.
        • Mukherjee M.
        • Donnelly A.D.
        • Pantanowitz L.
        • Austin R.M.
        Digital applications in cytopathology: problems, rationalizations, and alternative approaches.
        Acta Cytol. 2018; 62: 68-76
        • Evered A.
        • Dudding N.
        Accuracy and perceptions of virtual microscopy compared with glass slide microscopy in cervical cytology.
        Cytopathology. 2011; 22: 82-87
        • Bang J.Y.
        • Kirtane S.
        • Krall K.
        • Navaneethan U.
        • Hasan M.
        • Hawes R.
        • et al.
        In memoriam: fine-needle aspiration, birth: fine-needle biopsy: the changing trend in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition.
        Dig Endosc. 2019; 31: 197-202
        • Shugang X.
        • Hongfa Y.
        • Jianpeng L.
        • Xu Z.
        • Jingqi F.
        • Xiangxiang L.
        • et al.
        Prognostic value of SMAD4 in pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis.
        Transl Oncol. 2016; 9: 1-7
        • Pantanowitz L.
        • Sinard J.H.
        • Henricks W.H.
        • Fatheree L.A.
        • Carter A.B.
        • Contis L.
        • et al.
        Validating whole slide imaging for diagnostic purposes in pathology: guideline from the College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center.
        Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2013; 137: 1710-1722
        • Bailey P.
        • Chang D.K.
        • Nones K.
        • Johns A.L.
        • Patch A.M.
        • Gingras M.C.
        • et al.
        Genomic analyses identify molecular subtypes of pancreatic cancer.
        Nature. 2016; 531: 47-52
        • Gui D.
        • Cortina G.
        • Naini B.
        • Hart S.
        • Gerney G.
        • Dawson D.
        • et al.
        Diagnosis of dysplasia in upper gastro-intestinal tract biopsies through digital microscopy.
        J Pathol Inform. 2012; 3: 27
        • Jen K.Y.
        • Olson J.L.
        • Brodsky S.
        • Zhou X.J.
        • Nadasdy T.
        • Laszik Z.G.
        Reliability of whole slide images as a diagnostic modality for renal allograft biopsies.
        Hum Pathol. 2013; 44: 888-894
        • Velez N.
        • Jukic D.
        • Ho J.
        Evaluation of 2 whole-slide imaging applications in dermatopathology.
        Hum Pathol. 2008; 39: 1341-1349
        • Ho J.
        • Ahlers S.M.
        • Stratman C.
        • Aridor O.
        • Pantanowitz L.
        • Fine J.L.
        • et al.
        Can digital pathology result in cost savings? A financial projection for digital pathology implementation at a large integrated health care organization.
        J Pathol Inform. 2014; 5: 33