Digestive and Liver Disease
Volume 42, Issue 4 , Pages 291-296, April 2010

Colon anatomy based on CT colonography and fluoroscopy: Impact on looping, straightening and ancillary manoeuvres in colonoscopy

  • Axel Eickhoff

      Affiliations

    • Medical Department C, Klinikum Ludwigshafen gGmbH, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Department of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany. Tel.: +49 040 42803 3424.
  • ,
  • Perry J. Pickhardt

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison, WI, USA
  • ,
  • Dirk Hartmann

      Affiliations

    • Medical Department C, Klinikum Ludwigshafen gGmbH, Germany
  • ,
  • Jürgen F. Riemann

      Affiliations

    • Medical Department C, Klinikum Ludwigshafen gGmbH, Germany

Received 2 September 2008; accepted 29 April 2009. published online 08 June 2009.

Abstract 

Background

Unsedated colonoscopy is an uncomfortable procedure for most patients. Discomfort during colonoscopy is largely related to looping of the colonoscope which displaces the colon from its native configuration. Therefore, complete intubation of the colon is considerably difficult in up to 10–20% of procedures. Aims of this study were to determine the “normal” colon anatomy in CT-colonoscopy with special focus on length, number of flexures and tortuosity and to assess frequency and type of looping as well as straightening manoeuvres based on fluoroscopic findings.

Methods

100 consecutive screening patients underwent CT colonography and another 100 cases traditional colonoscopy with fluoroscopic aid. Interactive 3D colon maps and 2D MPR images from virtual procedures were reviewed by two experienced GI-radiologists and GI-endoscopists. Colonoscopy was performed by three board-certified gastroenterologists. Fluoroscopic films of each case were recorded and retrospectively analysed.

Results

There was a considerable difference in overall colonic length between CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy (167cm vs. 93.5cm). Number of acute angle flexures and degree of tortuosity was higher in CT colonography than previously assumed. The caecum was reached in 98/100 cases with conventional colonoscopy. Procedures were incomplete due to an obstructing sigmoid cancer and a floppy redundant colon. Looping occurred in 73/100 cases and straightening manoeuvres with fluoroscopy were highly effective in 95%. Looping was more common in older and smaller women.

Conclusions

Predictive anatomical factors for potentially difficult endoscopic colonoscopy can be defined by CT colonography. Looping occurs frequently during routine colonoscopy but hindered caecal intubation in only one case. Short-term fluoroscopy is extremely helpful to guide straightening and ancillary manoeuvres and should be used selectively in patients with looping during conventional colonoscopy.

Keywords: Colon anatomy, Colonic looping, Short-term fluoroscopy, Virtual colonoscopy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1590-8658(09)00223-0

doi:10.1016/j.dld.2009.04.022

Digestive and Liver Disease
Volume 42, Issue 4 , Pages 291-296, April 2010