Treatment of chronic hepatitis B: Recommendations from an Italian workshop☆
Article Outline
- Abstract
- 1. Workshop structure and agenda
- 2. Recommendations
- 3. Patients with HBeAg negative chronic hepatitis B
- 4. Patients with cirrhosis (HBeAg positive and negative)
- 5. Immune suppressed patients
- 6. Co-infections
- 7. Conclusions
- Conflict of interest statement
- Acknowledgments
- References
- Copyright
Abstract
The changing scenario of hepatitis B virus therapy has encouraged the organisation of a workshop, endorsed by three Italian scientific societies, aimed at defining the current recommendations for hepatitis B virus treatment. Liver histology and stage of disease remain fundamental for treatment decisions; interferon and nucleoside/nucleotide analogues-based therapy represent different strategies for different phases of the hepatitis B virus disease. The recommendations defined: new and lower cut-off of hepatitis B virus–DNA for eligibility to therapy according to disease stage, how to optimise the use of nucleoside/nucleotide analogues and to individualise the monitoring of response and what to do with treatment failures. Specific recommendations have also been given for cirrhosis patients, those immune suppressed and co-infected with HIV and other hepatitis viruses.
Keywords: Antiviral therapy, Cirrhosis, HBV, HCV, HDV, HIV, Immune suppressed
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a major cause of liver disease in Italy, despite the improvement in socio-economic conditions and the introduction of universal vaccination of newborn babies and young adolescents. National health bodies estimate that there might be at least one million individuals chronically infected with HBV (HBsAg carriers), and hepatitis B ranks third among the causes of liver related death occurring annually in the country. The burden of HBV infection in Italy has recently further increased by the massive influx of immigrants from regions of Europe, Africa and Asia where HBV is highly endemic. It has been estimated that during the past 10 years at least 250,000 immigrants who are carriers of HBV have entered Italy.
National guidelines and recommendations for the treatment of HBV have not been updated since 2003. Recently, however, new treatment for the disease has been developed and licensed, including pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) alfa 2a and new nucleoside/nucleotide analogues (NAs). Six compounds are currently licensed in Italy for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (Table 1). Tenofovir, a potent nucleotide analogue, and Emtricitabine, a nucleoside analogue, both active on HIV and HBV are licensed only for HIV treatment. Several registration trials have analysed the efficacy of new drugs against HBV. However, these studies have certain limitations due to the short duration of the trials, lack of head-to-head comparison between different compounds, and very limited information about their combined use. For these reasons, there are still open questions on the best approach to treat hepatitis B. The most recent International Guidelines and Recommendations have largely been based on expert opinion that frequently needs to be updated and also adapted to local epidemiology and resources.
Table 1. Compounds that are currently licensed in Italy for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B
| Interferon (IFN) alfa 2a and alfa 2b |
| Lamivudine |
| Adefovir |
| Entecavir |
| Telbivudine |
| Pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) alfa 2a |
These considerations have encouraged the organisation of a workshop, endorsed by the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver (Associazione Italiana Per lo Studio del Fegato AISF), the Italian Society of Infectious and Tropical Diseases (Società Italiana per lo studio delle Malattie Infettive e Tropicali: SIMIT) and the Italian Society for the Study of Sexually Transmitted Diseases (Società Italiana per lo studio delle Malattie Sessualmente Trasmettibili: SIMAST), that was held in May 2007, in Stresa, Italy.
The aim of the workshop was to develop recommendations for the treatment of chronic HBV infection.
1. Workshop structure and agenda
The editors first identified five major clinical categories of patients with HBV infection and two main questions to be addressed for each category (Table 2). They also identified one expert for each category among the members of the Italian scientific community and asked each to prepare an initial statement based on an extensive literature review and expert opinion. The pertinent literature was obtained by systematic research of the Ovid databases (including MEDLINE and AIDSLINE) from 1 January 1993 to 30 April 2007, using the following keywords: hepatitis B; HCV; HIV; liver diseases; immune suppression; antiviral therapy; therapy; interferon. These medical subjects headings terms were explored and appropriate search combinations were also performed. References were manually scanned for relevant articles published before 1993. Abstracts presented at major International Congresses on viral hepatitis and HIV infection and those of International Societies of Hepatology published in the years 2005–2007 were also reviewed [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53], [54], [55], [56], [57], [58], [59], [60], [61], [62], [63], [64], [65], [66], [67], [68], [69], [70], [71], [72], [73], [74], [75], [76], [77], [78], [79], [80], [81], [82], [83], [84], [85], [86], [87], [88], [89], [90], [91], [92], [93], [94], [95], [96], [97], [98], [99], [100], [101], [102], [103], [104], [105], [106], [107], [108], [109], [110], [111], [112], [113], [114], [115], [116], [117], [118], [119], [120], [121], [122], [123], [124], [125], [126], [127], [128], [129], [130], [131], [132], [133], [134], [135], [136], [137], [138], [139], [140], [141], [142], [143], [144], [145], [146], [147], [148], [149], [150], [151], [152], [153], [154], [155], [156], [157], [158], [159], [160], [161], [162], [163], [164], [165], [166], [167], [168], [169], [170], [171], [172], [173], [174], [175], [176], [177], [178], [179], [180], [181], [182], [183], [184], [185], [186], [187], [188], [189], [190], [191], [192], [193], [194], [195], [196], [197], [198], [199], [200], [201], [202], [203]. A selection of the literature was provided to all those who attended the workshop.
Table 2. Structure of the Workshop
| The five clinical categories of hepatitis B/HBV infection considered were |
| The two questions posed for each clinical category were |
The initial draft statements were prepared by experts based on this review of the literature, and were formulated according to the method identified by a nominal group meeting and graded for scientific strength and quality using a modification of the scoring system proposed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA; Table 3). Then, on the first day of the workshop meeting held in Stresa, Italy, the statements were presented by the experts and extensively discussed by the whole audience, including nine members of a scientific board. In the afternoon of the same day, five parallel smaller working groups of 10–15 participants (experts, members of the scientific board and practicing physicians) led by five “tutors” extensively discussed each of the five patients categories and reformulated the statements according to the general and small group discussions.
Table 3. System for ranking recommendations modified from Infectious Diseases Society of America–United States Public Health System Grading Service for ranking recommendations in clinical guidelines
| Category, grade | Definition |
|---|---|
| Strength of recommendation | |
| Good evidence to support a recommendation | |
| Moderate evidence to support a recommendation | |
| Poor evidence to support a recommendation | |
| Quality of evidence | |
| Evidence from >1 properly randomised, controlled trial | |
| Evidence from >1 well-designed clinical trial, without randomisation; from cohort or case-controlled analytical studies; from multiple time-series, or from dramatic results from uncontrolled experiments | |
| Evidence from opinions of respected authorities, based on clinical experience, descriptive studies or reports of expert committees | |
On the second day of the workshop, the reformulated statements were presented again to the whole audience by the tutors of each group and further discussed, modified accordingly and then voted for by all participants, point by point, using a tele-voting system. Statements reaching >80% consensus were accepted while those with <80% consensus were further discussed and modified to reach >80% consensus.
Finally a jury panel of 12 experts, who had attended the whole meeting and parallel sessions, was asked to elaborate the final statement with the main recommendations of the workshop, which are summarised in this document.
The statements were prepared taking into consideration all commercially available products shown to be effective against HBV, independently and regardless of the current indications and reimbursement policies of the Italian Ministry of Health. Off-label use of drugs registered for indications other than HBV therapy was considered only when there was an important clinical need that was unmet by reimbursed drugs and use strategies.
2. Recommendations
2.1. Patients with HBeAg positive cronic hepatitis B
2.1.1. Whom and when to treatCandidates for treatment are patients with:
>
20,000
IU/mL and the presence of HBeAg for more than 6 months;
<
2 times the ULN and at least moderate fibrosis at liver biopsy (Ishak stage S2 or more) (A1).
Patients with HBV–DNA
>
20,000
IU/mL but with normal ALT should not be treated (BII). Liver biopsy may be considered in those with borderline ALT (abnormal ALT
<
2 times the UNL) when older than 40 years or with an anti-HBc IgM index value greater than 0.2. They should be considered for treatment if the biopsy displays at least moderate liver fibrosis (Isak stage
≥
S2) (BIII).
Alfa interferon should be the first line of treatment for HBeAg positive patients without cirrhosis (BIII). Both non-pegylated alfa 2a and alfa 2b interferons, but only pegylated alfa 2a interferon are registered for this purpose, although pegylated alfa 2b interferon has shown equal efficacy in phase II studies. Response predictors to IFN therapy are baseline ALT
>
5 times the UNL, baseline HBV–DNA
<
20,000,000
IU/mL, genotype A or B (AII).
Treatment with the NAs should be considered in patients with more advanced fibrosis (Ishak stage
≥
3) if a patient:
NAs should be considered as first line of therapy when the patient has an ALT flare with jaundice (CIII). Short-term treatment with NAs aimed at obtaining anti-HBe sero-conversion could be considered in patients with less severe fibrosis (<S3) when one of the above-mentioned reasons for not using IFN is present.
Monotherapy with Entecavir (0.5
mg/d) or Telbivudine (600
mg/d) should be preferred to Adefovir (10
mg/d) due to higher antiviral potency (CIII). Monotherapy with Lamivudine should not be used in principle due to the high risk of developing viral resistance (AI). Treatment with Entecavir should be preferred in patients with HBV–DNA
≥
200,000,000
IU/mL (BIII). Monotherapy with NAs should be continued for 6 months after sero-conversion to anti-HBe and HBV–DNA clearance or indefinitely in patients who do not achieve anti-HBe sero-conversion but reach HBV–DNA levels <200
IU/mL after 6 months (with Telbivudine) or 12 months (with Adefovir and Entecavir). Treatment should be reconsidered and adjusted in patients with sub-optimal response (see below). De novo combination regimens with two NAs (one nucleotide and one nucleoside) could be associated with a reduced risk of resistance, but there is no definitive evidence of greater antiviral efficacy compared to monotherapy (CIII). The same applies to the combination of PEG-IFN with a NA (AII).
2.1.2.1. Patients with resistance or primary non-response or sub-optimal response to NAs
IU/mL after 6 months of treatment with Lamivudine or Telbivudine or after 12 months of treatment with Adefovir, or Entecavir (AII).
Patients treated with a NA and with primary non-response, or sub-optimal response or breakthrough must be considered for treatment adjustment. Genotypic resistance testing is often useful to guide therapeutic choices (BII). Genotypic resistance testing is recommended before changing or restarting NA therapy in patients already treated with more than one antiviral drug.
mg/d of Entecavir. (CIII) or switch to Tenofovir in combination with a nucleoside analogue (based on genotypic resistance profile) should be considered.
2.1.2.2. Virological monitoring
In all patients with undetectable HBV–DNA on or off therapy the HBsAg/anti-HBs status should be defined every 12 months.
IU/mL after 6 months is associated with a poor chance of sustained response (CIII).
2.1.2.3. On and off treatment non-virological monitoring
3. Patients with HBeAg negative chronic hepatitis B
3.1. Whom and when to treat
Defining the stage of liver disease (fibrosis) plays a key role in deciding whether and how to treat (AII).
Candidates for treatment are patients with:
>
2000
IU/mL;
Patients with active HBV replication (HBV–DNA
>
2000
IU/mL) and normal ALT should be evaluated for evidence of liver disease using clinical and biochemical parameters, haematological parameters (platelets count, etc.) and non-invasive assessment (including ultrasound and, when available, transient elastography). Patients with normal ALT and high HBV–DNA levels should undergo sequential ALT monitoring (every 3–4 months) and evaluation of anti-HBc IgM to identify patients with liver disease. Liver biopsy should be considered when an underlying liver disease is suspected by such non-invasive evaluation. Patients with normal or borderline ALT and significant fibrosis (Ishak stage of at least S2) should be considered for treatment. Liver biopsy should also be considered in patients with high ALT and borderline HBV–DNA (between 2000 and 20,000
IU/ml) to ensure that liver disease is due to HBV, and to exclude other possible cofactors of liver damage (including liver steatosis).
3.2. How to treat and what strategy to take
Patients with Ishak stage
<
3 fibrosis can be monitored or treated with IFN or PEG-IFN, as outlined for HBeAg positive (AII).
In patients with Ishak stage
≥
3 fibrosis, IFN or PEG-IFN or NA can all be considered as first choice. Since both types of therapy have important limitations (PEG-IFN: low efficacy and significant side effects, NAs need to be taken long term, possibly life-long with a variable risk of developing resistant mutants), patients must be fully informed and should participate in the choice of therapy.
Treatment with NAs requires the protracted, possibly indefinite, administration of the NA. NAs should be selected according both to the degree of HBV inhibition (antiviral efficacy) and to the risk of developing NA resistant HBV mutants (AII). According to currently available data, monotherapy should be considered with:
“De novo” combination therapy with a nucleoside and a nucleotide seems to be a reasonable option; however evidence-based data on its use as first line treatment is lacking (CIII). Monotherapy with Lamivudine should not be used in principle due to the high risk of developing viral resistance.
In patients with high baseline viremia (>2,000,000
IU/mL), Entecavir monotherapy or “de novo” combination therapy (with the limitation of the lack of evidence-based data) should be preferred (CIII).
Virological monitoring for HBV–DNA and resistance testing should be the same as that recommended in HBeAg positive patients.
In patients on interferon who maintain HBV–DNA levels greater than 200,000
IU/mL after 24 weeks of treatment withdrawal should be considered because of the low probability of sustained response (CIII).
Management of resistance or sub-optimal response to NA is similar to that in HBeAg positive patients. Resistance testing should be used, as in HBe-Ag positive patients.
4. Patients with cirrhosis (HBeAg positive and negative)
4.1. Whom and when to treat
Before starting treatment of a patient with cirrhosis, the following parameters should be considered:
Patients with compensated or decompensated cirrhosis and HBV–DNA
>
200
IU/mL should be considered for treatment, independently of ALT levels. Patients with HBV–DNA
<
200
IU/mL should be monitored without anti-HBV treatment (BIII).
4.2. How to treat and what strategy to take
4.2.1. Compensated cirrhosis (HBeAg positive or negative)IFN and PEG-IFN or NAs can be considered as first line therapy.
PEG-IFN (or standard IFNs) should only be considered in patients without a history of decompensation and no features of portal hypertension (oesophagogastric varices), in particular those who are young, HBeAg positive and with favourable predictors of response (HBV–DNA
<
2,000,000
IU/mL, elevated ALT, non-D HBV genotype) (BII). As in the HBeAg positive setting interferon may induce hepatic flares; this drug should be used with caution and in centres with experience in treating hepatitis B (CIII). Fig. 1 summarises treatment recommendations across the clinical spectrum of HBV diseases.

Fig. 1.
The “Stresa Paradigm” summarising the indications for treatment of patients with hepatitis B with or without cirrhosis.
NAs should be used in patients with contraindications, intolerance, non-responders to IFN or those unwilling to receive IFN; monotherapy can be proposed with Entecavir or Telbivudine or Adefovir. Lamivudine monotherapy should not be used for the consistent risk of resistance (AI). NAs in combination should be considered when the risk of decompensation is thought to be imminent and in the presence of high HBV–DNA levels (AII); IFN and a PEG/IFN-α should not be used in these patients.
Best options are:
<
2,000,000
IU/mL.
Adefovir monotherapy is limited by its slow potency, in particular in patients with high baseline HBV–DNA (BIII).
4.2.2. Decompensated cirrhosisThere are still no data on the use of Entecavir or Telbivudine monotherapy in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. All patients should be in principle treated with a combination of a nucleotide and a nucleoside analogue in order to obtain a rapid and most durable suppression of HBV–DNA. In patients eligible for liver transplant treatment should be started after consultation and in collaboration with the transplant centre of reference.
Recommended therapeutic options are:
Monitoring in cirrhotics is the same as recommended for non-cirrhotics; however liver function tests should be performed more frequently in patients on NA, in particular in those with decompensated cirrhosis.
5. Immune suppressed patients
5.1. Whom to treat or protect
>
2,000
IU/mL) regardless of the clinical setting (oncology, haematology, rheumatology, nephrology, gastroenterology, dermatology and solid organ transplantation) (AII).
mg/die) for prolonged periods, ciclofosphamide, metotrexate, leflunomide, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, azathioprine and micofenolate.
5.2. When to treat
>
2,000
IU/mL) in HBsAg carriers and immediately after HBsAg+ seroreversion (CIII).
5.3. How to treat
5.4. What strategy to take
Observational studies are always recommended in patients with present or past HBV infection.
6. Co-infections
IU/ml should be used to identify active HBV infection.
For the same reason, a longitudinal and repeated evaluation of HBV–DNA is needed to identify active HBV infection or reactivation of HBV in HBsAg-positive patients on and off treatment for HCV and/or HDV co-infections (AII). In patients with HBV–DNA levels persistently <2000
IU/mL there is no indication for HBV treatment (AI).
6.1. Co-infection with HCV
6.1.1. Whom and when to treat and what strategy to take6.1.1.1. Patients with active HCV and HBV infections
Treatment should be with PEG-IFN alfa
+
Ribavirin according to the HCV schedule (BII). Treatment response should be evaluated after 24 weeks. Response for HCV is HCV-RNA undetectable; for HBV, HBV–DNA
<
20,000
IU/mL with a decrease of at least 1 log from baseline.
6.1.1.2. Patients with active HCV infection and inactive HBV infection
These patients should be treated with PEG-IFN alfa and ribavirin according to the HCV schedule (BII). HBV–DNA levels should be monitored at least bimonthly during therapy due to the possibility of HBV reactivation after HCV suppression (AI). A 48-week treatment should also be considered in treating HCV genotypes 2 and 3 (CIII). HBV reactivation during HCV therapy should be treated with NA (BIII).
Patients with active HBV infection and inactive HCV infection should be treated according to the recommendations given for HBV (AI), HCV-RNA should be monitored every 2 months during therapy due to the possibility of HCV reactivation after HBV suppression. Reactivation of HCV should be treated as indicated for chronic hepatitis C (BII).
6.2. Co-infection with HDV
6.2.1. Whom and when to treatThis decision should be based on:
In patients without anti-HD of IgM class and HDV-RNA, and with inactive HBV infection treatment is not indicated (AI). The virological evaluation for both viruses should be repeated every 4–12 months (AII).
In patients with serum HD-RNA and/or anti-HD-IgM with or without active HBV:
6.3. Co-infection with HDV and HCV
6.3.1. Whom and when to treat and what strategy to takePatients in whom all the three infections are active should be treated with PEG-IFN for 48–72 weeks
+
Ribavirin for 24–48 weeks according to the HCV schedule (BIII). If there is no HBV response after 24 weeks of treatment, consider NA (BIII). In patients with one or two active infections, treatment should be targeted to the active viruses (BIII).
6.4. Co-infection with HIV
6.4.1. Whom and when to treat
<
200/μL) or in the presence of hypertransaminasemia (BIII).
>
500 and without immediate indications for HIV treatment should be treated according to the recommendations given for HBV monoinfection (CIII), possibly in randomised controlled trials or in observational studies (CIII).
<
500 or with indication for anti-retroviral treatment (ART) this should include two drugs active against HBV (AIII). When ART is indicated, with other drugs, knowledge of the disease stage is essential to define the treatment strategy (AIII). HBV treatment is indicated in all patients with advanced liver disease (i.e., S
>
3) (AII).
>
500 and without any immediate indications for anti-HIV treatment, HBV treatment should be started as in anti-HIV negative patients (BIII), NA should be preferred to PEG-IFN in HBeAg negative patients (CIII). In patients who are candidates for NA treatment, combinations of a nucleoside analogue and a nucleotide analogue is the first choice. Adefovir and Telbivudine could be used without starting cART, Tenofovir and Lamivudine or Emtricitabine or Entecavircould be used only by anticipating cART (CIII).
<
500 or with indication to HIV therapy cART including Tenofovir
+
Entricitabine/Lamivudine should be initiated. If Tenofovir is not included as a part of cART, it should be added. In case of contra-indications, Tenofovir could be substituted by Adefovir. Entecavir and Telbivudine can substitute Emtricitabine/Lamivudine if they are not indicated as part of cART (CIII). In clinically stable HBeAg positive patients with CD4 levels greater than 350, a cycle of interferon to induce anti-HBe sero-conversion could be considered (CIII). Withdrawal of HBV drugs has been associated with a worsening prognosis in HIV co-infected patients; HBV drugs should be maintained in patients with advanced fibrosis (>S3) (BII). Costs/benefits evaluation should be pursued in before stopping all drugs active on HBV in those with milder disease (CIII).
Tests for the identification of HBV mutations associated with resistance to HBV drugs should be considered:
7. Conclusions
Future therapeutic needs, improvements and perspectives were debated. There is a need for further investigations to implement Tenofovir in therapeutic strategies, establish the long-term efficacy of NAs, to develop therapies for HDV disease and to minimise the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma with treatment. There was general agreement that in the future the most efficacious therapeutic strategies will be a combination of drugs rather than a therapy with a single drug, however potent. It was nevertheless admitted that current attempts to combine PEG-IFN and Lamivudine or Adefovir do not seem to be any more rewarding. The problem of drug-resistant mutants under therapy created a lot of interest and the risk of the ultimate emergence of mutants resistant to all antivirals raised concern. It was recommended that NA-therapies should be guided by knowledge of the genotypic asset of HBV rather than by empirical treatment/adaptation; genotype-guided therapy was regarded as mandatory in patients to be re-treated after a viral breakthrough.
The issue of the cost of therapy and the burden to the public or private economy was considered; the prohibitive impact on public health budgets of the current costs of combination therapies was recognised as a major non-medical obstacle to combination therapy.
Practice points
Prevention of HBV drugs resistance
Research agenda
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
Acknowledgments
The workshop was endorsed by Italian Association for the Study of the Liver (Associazione Italiana Per lo Studio del Fegato AISF), the Italian Society of Infectious and Tropical Diseases (Società Italiana per lo studio delle Malattie Infettive e Tropicali: SIMIT) and the Italian Society for the Study of Sexually Transmitted Diseases (Società Italiana per lo studio delle Malattie Sessualmente Trasmettibili: SIMAST).
The following persons took part to this event and to the elaboration process of these recommendations.
Scientific board: Pietro Andreone, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico Sant’Orsola Malpighi, Bologna; Mario Angelico, Università di Roma “Tor Vergata”, Roma; Antonio Ascione, Azienda Ospedaliera “A. Cardarelli”, Napoli; Nicola Caporaso, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Policlinico, Napoli; Stefano Fagiuolim, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti di Bergamo; Giovanna Fattovich, Università degli Studi di Verona-Policlinico G.B. Rossi, Verona; Mario Mondelli, Università di Pavia-IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia; Grazia Anna Niro, IRCCS Casa del Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia; Patrizia Pontisso, Università degli Studi di Padova.
Faculty: Ferruccio Bonino, Policlinico di Milano; Carlo Federico Perno, Università degli Studi di Roma, Tor Vergata; Daniele Prati, Ospedale A Manzoni Lecco.
Other invited participants: Massimo Andreoni, Ospedale Civile degli Infermi, Biella; Gioacchino Angarano, Ospedali Riuniti di Foggia; Eleonora Annicchiarico, Università Cattoloca Sacro Cuore-Policlinico Gemelli, Roma; Rosa Boncoraglio, Ospedale Maggiore di Modica; Diego Brustia, Azienda Ospedaliera Maggiore, Novara; Nino Calabrese, Azienda Ospedaliera Benfratelli, Palermo; Antonio Carlotto, Ospedale San Camillo De Lellis, Schio; Luisa Cavalletto, Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova, Padova; Maurizio Cavina, Azienda Ospedaliera Policlinico Modena; Luchino Chessa, Policlinico Universitario di Cagliari Monserrato; Guido Croce, Ospedale San Carlo Borromeo, Milano; Giuseppe De Sanctis, Policlinico Umberto I, Roma; Francesco Di Candilo, Policlinico Silvestrini S.M. della Misericordia, Perugia; Paolo Fabris, Ospedale Civile S. Bortolo, Vicenza; Osvaldo Fracassetti, Ospedali Riuniti di Bergamo; Alfonso Galeota Lanza, A.O.R.N. Cardarelli, Napoli; Tiziana Giuberti, Azienda Ospedaliera di Parma; Giuseppe Guazzotti, Azienda Ospedaliera San Pietro e Paolo, Borgosesia; Tiziana Iacovazzi, Ospedale Fallacara, Bari; Vincenzo Iovinella, ASL NA 1 Ospedale San Paolo, Napoli; Antonio Izzi, Azienda Ospedaliera D. Cotugno, Napoli; Pietro Loperfido, Ospedale Santissima Annunziata, Taranto; Carlo Fedrico Magni, Ospedale Luigi Sacco, Milano; Nicoletta Marino, Ospedale S.M.Annunziata Azienda Sanitaria di Firenze; Vincenzo Messina, Azienda Ospedaliera Sant’Anna e San Sebastiano di Caserta; Giuseppe Michelone, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia; Roberto Morante, Policlinica Federico II, Napoli; Alessandra Moretti, Ospedale S. Filippo Neri, Roma; Paola Nasta Spedali Civili di Brescia; Leone Nauri, San Camillo, Roma; Amerigo Paffetti, Policlinico Umberto I, Roma; Michela Pasino, Azienda Ospedaliera Borgo Roma Policlinica Rossi, Verona; Giorgio Perboni, Ospedale Carlo Poma, Mantova; Enzo Petrelli, Azienda Ospedaliera “Ospedale San Salvatore”, Pesaro; Antonio Picciotto, Università di Genova; Massimo Pozzi, Ospedale San Gerardo, Monza; Francesco Purificato, Presidio Ospedaliero Sud Formia e Gaeta; Tiziana Re, Azienda Ospedaliera Legnano Cuggiono; Roberto Rinaldi, Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova; Spartaco Sani, Ospedale Livorno; Renato Santoro, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti, Salerno; Ornella Schioppa, CRO Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Aviano; Gaetano Scotto, Ospedali Riuniti di Foggia; Massimo Siciliano Università Cattolica S. Cuore, Roma; Orazio Sorbello, Policlinico Universitario, Monserrato; Giovanni Squadrito, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico G. Martino, Messina; Maria Teresa Taddei, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Carlo Borromeo, Milano; Antonio Traversa, Azienda Ospedaliera di Aosta; Paolo Tundo, Ospedale Santa Caterina Novella, Galatina; Giovanna Venezia, Università degli Studi di Palermo; Luigi Vilardo, Azienda Ospedaliera di Cosenza; Anna Linda Zignego, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Firenze; Alessia Zoncada, Azienda Ospedaliera Maggiore di Cremona; Massimo Zuin, Azienda Ospedaliera San Paolo, Milano.
References
- . Can serum HBV-DNA be used as a primary end point to assess efficacy of new treatments for chronic hepatitis B?. Hepatology. 2003;38:18–20
- . Recent progress and new trends in the treatment of hepatitis B. J Med Virol. 2002;67:458–462
- Short statement of the first European Consensus Conference on the treatment of chronic hepatitis B and C in HIV co-infected patients. J Hepatol. 2005;42:615–624
- Identification and characterization of mutations in hepatitis B virus resistant to lamivudine. Lamivudine Clinical Investigation Group. Hepatology. 1998;27:1670–1677
- . Lamivudine-associated remission of chronic hepatitis delta. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132:598
- Resistance to adefovir dipivoxil therapy associated with the selection of a novel mutation in the HBV polymerase. Gastroenterology. 2003;125:292–297
- Natural history of hepatitis B and C in renal allograft recipients. Transplantation. 2005;79:1132–1136
- . Ninety-six-week efficacy of combination therapy with lamivudine and tenofovir in patients coinfected with HIV-1 and wild- type hepatitis B virus. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39:1062–1064
- . Prompt relapse of viremia after lamivudine discontinuation in e-minus chronic hepatitis B patients completely responders during 5 years of therapy. J Hepatol. 2004;41:500–501
- . Antiviral drug resistance: clinical consequences and molecular aspects. Semin Liver Dis. 2006;26:162–170
- Hepatitis-B-virus resistance to lamivudine given for recurrent infection after orthotopic liver transplantation. Lancet. 1997;349:20–22
- Efficacy of combined lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil treatment for severe HBV graft reinfection after living donor liver transplantation. Clin Transplant. 2003;17:554–559
- Safety and efficacy of adefovir dipivoxil in patients infected with lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B and HIV-1. J Hepatol. 2006;44:62–67
- Anti-hepatitis B virus efficacy of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in HIV-infected patients. Hepatology. 2006;43:548–555
- Long-term incidence of hepatitis B virus resistance to lamivudine in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patitents. Hepatology. 2000;31:1030–1031
- . Natural history of compensated viral cirrhosis: a prospective study on the incidence and hierarchy of major complications. Gut. 2004;53:744–749
- Lamivudine treatment can restore T cell responsiveness in chronic hepatitis B. J Clin Invest. 1998;102:968–975
- Transient restoration of anti-viral T cell responses induced by lamivudine therapy in chronic hepatitis B. J Hepatol. 2003;39:595–605
- Lamivudine treatment can overcome cytotoxic T-cell hyporesponsiveness in chronic hepatitis B: new perspectives for immune therapy. Hepatology. 2001;33:963–971
- Predicting response to peginterferon alpha-2a, lamivudine and the two combinedfor HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B. Gut. 2007;56:699–705
- . Impact of interferon-alpha therapy on the development of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with liver cirrhosis: results of an international survey. J Viral Hepat. 1997;4(Suppl. 2):79–82
- Serum immunoglobulin M antibody to hepatitis D as a surrogate marker of hepatitis D in interferon-treated patients and in patients who underwent liver transplantation. Hepatology. 1998;27:873–876
- . Which patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection will respond to alpha-interferon therapy? A statistical analysis of predictive factors [see comments]. Hepatology. 1989;10:761–763
- . Treatment of HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B with interferon or pegylated interferon. J Hepatol. 2003;39(Suppl. 1):S164–S167
- . Tailoring antiviral therapy in chronic hepatitis B patients with lamivudine resistance. J Hepatol. 2007;46:756–758
- Outcome of anti-HBe positive chronic hepatitis B in alpha-interferon treated and untreated patients: a long term cohort study. J Hepatol. 2002;36:263–270
- . Rapid hepatitis B virus-DNA decay in co-infected HIV-hepatitis B virus ‘e-minus’ patients with YMDD mutations after 4 weeks of tenofovir therapy. AIDS. 2003;17:783–784
- Quantification of intrahepatic hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA in patients with chronic HBV infection. Hepatology. 2000;31:507–512
- A randomized, controlled trial of combination therapy for chronic hepatitis B: comparing pegylated interferon-alpha2b and lamivudine with lamivudine alone. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:240–250
- . Preemptive lamivudine therapy based on HBV DNA level in HBsAg-positive kidney allograft recipients. Hepatology. 2002;36:1246–1252
- A comparison of entecavir and lamivudine for HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:1001–1010
- A dose-ranging study of the efficacy and tolerability of entecavir in Lamivudine-refractory chronic hepatitis B patients. Gastroenterology. 2005;129:1198–1209
- Four years of lamivudine treatment in Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis B. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;19:1276–1282
- Steroid-free chemotherapy decreases risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in HBV-carriers with lymphoma. Hepatology. 2003;37:1320–1328
- . Pretherapy alanine transaminase level as a determinant for hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion during lamivudine therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B Asian Hepatitis Lamivudine Trial Group. Hepatology. 1999;30:770–774
- . Determinants for sustained HBeAg response to lamivudine therapy. Hepatology. 2003;38:1267–1273
- . Identification of HBV DNA sequences that are predictive of response to lamivudine therapy. Hepatology. 2004;39:64–73
- Impact of antiviral treatment on recurrence of hepatitis B virus infection and disease. Transplant Proc. 2003;35:1028–1029
- Transient elastography: a new surrogate marker of liver fibrosis influenced by major changes of transaminases. J Viral Hepat. 2007;14:360–369
- Quantitative analysis of IgM anti-HBc in chronic hepatitis B patients using a new “gray-zone” for the evaluation of “borderline” values. J Hepatol. 1996;25:644–648
- A multiphase model of the dynamics of HBV infection in HBeAg-negative patients during pegylated interferon-alpha2a, lamivudine and combination therapy. Antivir Ther. 2006;11:197–212
- Platelet and white blood cell counts during therapy with different types of alpha interferon in patients with chronic viral hepatitis. Investigators of the Alpha Interferon Study Group of Piemonte, Italy. Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1997;29:441–447
- Resistance after two years of entecavir treatment in nucleoside-naive patients is rare. Hepatology. 2006;45:1656–1665
- Adefovir added to lamivudine for hepatitis B recurrent infection in refractory B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia on prolonged therapy with Campath-1H. J Clin Virol. 2006;35:467–469
- Peginterferon alpha-2a (40 kDa): an advance in the treatment of hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B. J Viral Hepat. 2003;
- . Treatment options in HBV. J Hepatol. 2006;44(1 Suppl.):S77–S83
- . Pegylated interferons for chronic hepatitis B. Antiviral Res. 2003;60:87–89
- . Interferon-alpha for HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B. J Hepatol. 2003;39(Suppl. 1):S99–S105
- . From viral pathobiology to the treatment of hepatitis B virus infection EASL Monothematic Conference (Istanbul, Turkey, October 6-82005). J Hepatol. 2006;44:1186–1195
- High prevalence, low pathogenicity of hepatitis G virus in kidney transplant recipients. Dig Liver Dis. 2001;33:477–479
- Telbivudine globe trial: maximal early HBV suppression is predictive of optimal two-year efficacy in nucleoside-treated hepatitis B patients. Hepatology. 2006;44(Suppl.):230A–231A
- . Adefovir for lamivudine resistant HBV: more than meets the eye. J Hepatol. 2007;47:618–619
- The long-term course of chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology. 1999;30:257–264
- Clinical outcome of HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B in relation to virological response to lamivudine. Hepatology. 2004;40:883–891
- Lamivudine as initial treatment for chronic hepatitis B in the United States. New Engl J Med. 1999;341:1256–1263
- Durability of serologic response after lamivudine treatment of chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology. 2003;37:748–755
- Histological outcome during long-term lamivudine therapy. Gastroenterology. 2003;124:105–117
- Influence of HIV infection on the response to interferon therapy and the long-term outcome of chronic hepatitis B. Gastroenterology. 2002;123:1812–1822
- Efficacy of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in antiretroviral therapynaive and -experienced patients coinfected with HIV-1 and hepatitis B virus. J Infect Dis. 2004;189:1185–1192
- EASL International Consensus Conference on Hepatitis B, September 13–14, 2002, Geneva, Switzerland. Consensus Statement (short version). J Hepatol 2003;38:533–40.
- Severe liver disease is caused by HBV rather than HCV in children with hematological malignancies. Hematol J. 2003;4:321–327
- . Chronic hepatitis B reactivation following infliximab therapy in Crohn's disease patients: need for primary prophylaxis. Gut. 2004;53:1363–1365
- Virological and clinical aspects of HBV-HCV coinfection in HIV positive patients. J Med Virol. 2007;79:1679–1685
- Determinants of early mortality in patients with decompensated chronic hepatitis B treated with antiviral therapy. Gastroenterology. 2002;123:719–727
- . Transplantation of hepatitis B surface antigen-positive livers into hepatitis B virus-positive recipients and the role of hepatitis delta coinfection. Liver Transpl. 2005;11:922–928
- Virologic response and resistance to adefovir in patients with chronic hepatitis B. J Hepatol. 2006;44:283–290
- Adefovir-resistant hepatitis B can be associated with viral rebound and hepatic decompensation. J Hepatol. 2005;43:937–943
- . Sustained response after a 2-year course of lamivudine treatment of hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B. J Viral Hepat. 2004;11:432–438
- . Multiple viral infections. J Hepatol. 2006;44(1 Suppl.):S108–S113
- Four years of treatment with lamivudine: clinical and virological evaluations in HBe antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004;20:281–287
- . Clinical evaluation and applications of the Amplicor HBV Monitor test, a quantitative HBV DNA PCR assay. J Virol Methods. 1998;74:155–165
- Occult hepatitis B virus infection in HBsAg negative patients undergoing liver transplantation: clinical significance. Liver Transpl. 2004;10:356–362
- Long-term therapy with adefovir dipivoxil for HBeAg negative chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2673–2681
- Adefovir dipivoxil for the treatment of hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:800–807
- . Efficacy of long-term lamivudine monotherapy in patients with hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology. 2000;32:847–851
- Long-term adefovir dipivoxil treatment induces regression of liver fibrosis in patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B: results after 5 years of therapy [Abstract]. Hepatology. 2005;42(Suppl.):754A
- . Evaluation of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in coinfected patients receiving lamivudine as a componet of anti-human immunodeficiency virus regimens. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32:963–969
- . Acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B virus infection after withdrawal of lamivudine therapy. Hepatology. 2000;32:635–639
- . Management of hepatitis b: summary of a clinical research workshop. Hepatology. 2007;45:1056–1075
- Hepatitis B reactivation after withdrawal of pre-emptive lamivudine in patients with haematological malignancy on completion of cytotoxic chemotherapy. Gut. 2005;54:1597–1603
- Combination therapy with interferon-alpha and ribavirin in patients with dual hepatitis B and hepatitis C virus infection. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;20:727–732
- Hepatitis B virus reactivation and alemtuzumab therapy. Eur J Haematol. 2005;74:254–258
- Interferon alfa for chronic hepatitis B infection: increased efficacy of prolonged treatment. The European Concerted Action on Viral Hepatitis (EUROHEP). Hepatology. 1999;30:238–243
- Clinical trial of lamivudine in children with chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1706–1713
- . Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for the treatment of lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;2:266–272
- The treatment effect of alpha interferon in chronic hepatitis B is independent of pre-treatment variables. Results based on individual patient data from 10 clinical controlled trials. European Concerted Action on Viral Hepatitis (Eurohep). J Hepatol. 1994;21:646–655
- A one-year trial of lamivudine for chronic hepatitis B. Asia Hepatitis Lamivudine Study Group. New Engl J Med. 1998;339:61–68
- Entecavir versus lamivudine for patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:1011–1020
- A 1-year trial of telbivudine, lamivudine, and the combination in patients with hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B. Gastroenterology. 2005;129:528–536
- Telbivudine (LDT) vs. Lamivudine for Chronic hepatitis B: first-year results from the international phase III globe trial [abstract]. Hepatology. 2005;42(Suppl.):748A
- Two-year results from the globe trial in patients with hepatitis b: greater clinical and antiviral efficacy for telbivudine (LDT) vs. lamivudine [abstract]. Hepatology. 2006;44(Suppl.):222A
- . Low resistance to adefovir combined with lamivudine: a 3-year study of 145 lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B patients. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:1445–1451
- A randomized, controlled trial of a 24-month course of interferon alfa 2b in patients with chronic hepatitis B who had hepatitis B virus DNA without hepatitis B e antigen in serum. Hepatology. 1997;26:1621–1625
- Long-term suppression of hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B by 24-month interferon therapy. Hepatology. 2003;37:756–763
- Hepatitis B virus precore mutants in HBeAg carriers with chronic hepatitis treated with interferon. J Viral Hepat. 1995;2:251–256
- . Adefovir rapidly suppresses hepatitis B in HBeAg-negative patients developing genotypic resistance to lamivudine. Hepatology. 2005;42:1414–1419
- Long-term therapy of chronic hepatitis B with lamivudine. Hepatology. 2000;32:828–834
- Lamivudine for chronic delta hepatitis. Hepatology. 1999;30:546–549
- Preemptive use of lamivudine reduces hepatitis B exacerbation after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Hepatology. 2002;36:702–709
- Early is superior to deferred preemptive lamivudine therapy for hepatitis B patients undergoing chemotherapy. Gastroenterology. 2003;125:1742–1749
- . Effect of virological response on post-treatment durability of lamivudine-induced HBeAg seroconversion. J Viral Hepat. 2002;9:208–212
- Quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay for serum hepatitis B virus DNA as a predictive factor for post-treatment relapse after lamivudine induced hepatitis B e antigen loss or seroconversion. Gut. 2003;52:1779–1783
- Increased risk of adefovir resistance in patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B after 48 weeks of adefovir dipivoxil monotherapy. Hepatology. 2006;43:1385–1391
- Extended lamivudine treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B enhances hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion rates: results after 3 years of therapy. Hepatology. 2001;33:1527–1532
- Asian-pacific consensus statement on the management of chronic hepatitis B: a 2005 update. Liver Int. 2005;25:472–489
- . No benefit to continue lamivudine therapy after emergence of YMDD mutations. Antivir Ther. 2004;9:257–262
- Effects of extended lamivudine therapy in Asian patients with chronic hepatitis B. Asia Hepatitis Lamivudine Study Group. Gastroenterology. 2000;119:172–180
- . Acute exacerbation and hepatitis B virus clearance after emergence ofYMDD motif mutation during lamivudine therapy. Hepatology. 1999;30:567–572
- A double-blind placebo-controlled study of emtricitabine in chronic hepatitis B. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:49–56
- . Ribavirin and interferon is effective for hepatitis C virus clearance in hepatis B and C dually infected patients. Hepatology. 2003;37:568–576
- . Interferon treatment in hepatitis B surface antigen-positive hepatitis B e antibody-positive chronic hepatitis B: role of hepatitis B core antibody IgM titre in patient selection and treatment monitoring. J Viral Hepat. 1998;5:61–66
- Italian Cooperative Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Hepatitis reactivation and liver failure in haemopoietic stem cell transplants for hepatitis B virus (HBV)/hepatitis C virus (HCV) positive recipients: a retrospective study by the Italian group for blood and marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2003;31:295–300
- The role of hepatitis C and B virus infections as risk factors for severe liver complications following allogeneic BMT: a prospective study by the Infectious Disease Working Party of the European Blood and Marrow Transplantation Group. Transplantation. 1999;68:1486–1491
- . Reactivation of hepatitis B virus replication in patients receiving cytotoxic therapy. Report of a prospective study. Gastroenterology. 1991;100:182–188
- Long-term safety of lamivudine treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Gastroenterology. 2003;125:1714–1722
- . Long-term follow-up in a randomised controlled trial of recombinant alpha 2-interferon in Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis B infection. Lancet. 1988;2:298–302
- Evolution of hepatitis B virus polymerase gene mutations in hepatitis B e antigen-negative patients receiving lamivudine therapy. Hepatology. 2000;32:1145–1153
- . Interferon alpha treatment and retreatment of hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B. Gastroenterology. 2001;121:101–109
- Peginterferon alfa-2a alone, lamivudine alone, and the two in combination in patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1206–1217
- Adefovir dipivoxil for the treatment of hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:808–816
- Prophylaxis and treatment of hepatitis B in immunocompromised patients. Dig Liver Dis. 2007;39397–39408
- . Efficacy of lamivudine re-treatment in a patient with hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after liver transplantation and HBV-DNA breakthrough during the first treatment. Transplantation. 1998;65:1499–1500
- Recurrence of hepatitis B in liver transplants treated with antiviral therapy. Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1998;30:77–81
- Prophylaxis of hepatitis B virus infection before liver transplantation, 1990–2001: a single-center experience. Transplant Proc. 2003;35:1020–1021
- Viral load at the time of liver transplantation and risk of hepatitis B virus recurrence. Liver Transpl. 2005;11:402–409
- Prophylaxis of hepatitis B virus recurrence after liver transplantation in carriers of lamivudine-resistant mutants. Liver Transpl. 2005;11:532–538
- Prevention of hepatitis B virus recurrence after liver transplantation in cirrhotic patients treated with lamivudine and passive immunoprophylaxis. J Hepatol. 2001;34:903–910
- Risk of HBV reinfection after liver transplantation in HBsAg-positive cirrhosis. Primary hepatocellular carcinoma is not a predictor for HBV recurrence. The European Cooperative Study Group on Liver Cancer and Transplantation. Liver. 1996;16:117–122
- . Hepatitis B virus mutants associated with 3TC and famciclovir administration are replication defective. Hepatology. 1998;27:628–633
- Emergence of hepatitis B virus quasispecies with lower susceptibility to nucleos(t)ide analogues during lamivudine treatment. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007;60:341–349
- Pegylated interferon alpha-2b as monotherapy or in combination with ribavirin in chronic hepatitis delta. Hepatology. 2006;44:713–720
- Lamivudine therapy in chronic delta hepatitis: a multicentre randomized-controlled pilot study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005;22:227–232
- . Treatment of hepatitis D. J Viral Hepat. 2005;12:2–9
- Re-treatment of patients with anti-HBe-positive chronic hepatitis B who relapsed after an initial course of lamivudine. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003;18:933–940
- . Treatment of chronic hepatitis B in the human immunodeficiency virus-infected patient: present and future. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;37:1678–1685
- Long term response to therapy of chronic anti-HBe-positive hepatitis B is poor independent of type and schedule of interferon. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:1366–1372
- The polymerase L528M mutation cooperates with nucleotide binding-site mutations, increasing hepatitis B virus replication and drug resistance. J Clin Invest. 2001;107:449–455
- YMDD motif in hepatitis B virus DNA polymerase influences on replication and lamivudine resistance: a study by in vitro full-length viral DNA transfection. Hepatology. 1999;29:939–945
- . Hepatitis B reactivation in a chronic hepatitis B surface antigen carrier with rheumatoid arthritis treated with infliximab and low dose methotrexate. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003;62:686–687
- Predictors of HBeAg loss after lamivudine treatment for chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology. 2002;36:186–194
- . The long-term outcome of interferon-alpha treated and untreated patients with HBeAg negative chronic hepatitis B. J Hepatol. 2001;34:306–313
- Outcome of hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B on long-term nucleos(t)ide analog therapy starting with lamivudine. Hepatology. 2005;42:121–129
- . Course of virologic breakthroughs under long-term lamivudine in HBeAg-negative precore mutant HBV liver disease. Hepatology. 2002;36:219–226
- A multicenter United States-Canadian trial to assess lamivudine monotherapy before and after liver transplantation for chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology. 2001;33:424–432
- Randomized controlled study of tenofovir and adefovir in chronic hepatitis B virus and HIV infection: ACTG A5127. Hepatology. 2006;44:1110–1116
- Adefovir dipivoxil alone or in combination with lamivudine in patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B. Gastroenterology. 2004;126:91–101
- . Coinfection by hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus. Antivir Ther. 1998;3(Suppl. 3):137–142
- Hepatitis B virus co-infection in human immunodeficiency virus-infected subjects. AIDS Rev. 2002;4:27–35
- The management of hepatitis B virus/HIV-1 co-infected patients starting their first HAART regimen. Treating two infections for the price of one drug?. Antivir Ther. 2004;9:811–817
- . Impact of lamivudine on the risk of liver-related death in 2041 HBsAg- and HIV-positive individuals: results from an inter-cohort analysis. Antivir Ther. 2006;11:567–574
- Treatment of chronic hepatitis D with interferon alpha-2b in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. J Hepatol. 1998;29:45–52
- . Natural history of chronic hepatitis B in co-infected patients. J Hepatol. 2006;44(1 Suppl.):S65–S70
- Longitudinal evaluation reveals a complex spectrum of virological profiles in hepatitis B virus/hepatitis C virus-coinfected patients. Hepatology. 2006;43:100–107
- . Hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus co-infection: additive players in chronic liver disease?. Ann Hepatol. 2005;4:100–106
- Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate therapy for chronic hepatitis B in human immunodeficiency virus/hepatitis B virus-coinfected individuals for whom interferon-alpha and lamivudine therapy have failed. J Infect Dis. 2002;186:1844–1847
- . What is the clinical impact of occult hepatitis B virus infection?. Lancet. 2005;365:638–640
- . Treatment of hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B with lamivudine. J Hepatol. 2003;39(Suppl. 1):S168–S171
- Extended lamivudine treatment in patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B. J Hepatol. 2005;42:173–179
- Changing pattern of chronic hepatitis D in Southern Europe. Gastroenterology. 1999;117:161–166
- . Primary prophylaxis with lamivudine of hepatitis B virus reactivation in chronic HbsAg carriers with lymphoid malignancies treated with chemotherapy. Br J Haematol. 2001;115:58–62
- Long-term additional lamivudine therapy enhances durability of lamivudine-induced HBeAg loss: a prospective study. J Hepatol. 2003;39:614–619
- Virological profiles in hepatitis B virus/hepatitis C virus coinfected patients under interferon plus ribavirin therapy. Antivir Ther. 2006;11:931–934
- . Report of the monothematic EASL conference on liver transplantation for viral hepatitis (Paris, France, January 12–14, 2006). J Hepatol. 2006;45:127–143
- Liver graft infection by HBV S-gene mutants in transplant patients receiving long-term HBIg prophylaxis. Hepatogastroenterology. 1999;46:1848–1854
- . Long-term follow-up of patients with anti-HBe/HBV DNA-positive chronic hepatitis B treated for 12 months with lamivudine. J Hepatol. 2000;32:300–306
- . Lamivudine is safe and effective in fulminant hepatitis B. J Hepatol. 1999;30:551
- Lamivudine/interferon combination therapy in anti-HBe positive chronic hepatitis B patients: a controlled pilot study. J Hepatol. 2006;36:799–804
- Lamivudine and alpha interferon combination treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B infection: a randomised trial [see comments]. Gut. 2000;46:562–568
- Lamivudine and 24 weeks of lamivudine/interferon combination therapy for hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B in interferon nonresponders. J Hepatol. 2003;38:818–826
- . Adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) provides significant clinical benefit, reduces meld score and prevents transplantation in chronic hepatitis B patients wait-listed for liver transplantation (OLT) with Lamivudine-resistance (LAM-R) [abstract]. J Hepatol. 2005;42(Suppl. 2):5
- Adefovir dipivoxil therapy for lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B in pre- and post-liver transplantation patients. Hepatology. 2003;38:1419–1427
- Risk of selecting K65R in antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected individuals with chronic hepatitis B treated with adefovir. AIDS. 2005;19:2036–2038
- Entecavir for treatment of lamivudine-refractory. HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:2039–2049
- Different aspects of HDV and HBV reinfections and liver disease in orthotopic liver transplant (OLT). Prog Clin Biol Res. 1993;382:393–402
- Long-term lamivudine therapy for children with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology. 2006;43:225–232
- . Hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion after lamivudine therapy is not durable in patients with chronic hepatitis B in Korea. Hepatology. 2000;32:803–806
- Care of patients with chronic hepatitis B and HIV co-infection: recommendations from an HIV-HBV International Panel. AIDS. 2005;19:221–240
- . Adefovir dipivoxil-associated thrombocytopenia in a patient with chronic hepatitis B. Dig Liver Dis. 2006;38:211–212
- Viral blips during long-term treatment with standard or double dose lamivudine in HBe antigen negative chronic hepatitis B. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13:5642–5647
- Nomenclature for antiviral-resistant human hepatitis B virus mutations in the polymerase region. Hepatology. 2001;33:751–757
- A randomized double-blind phase II study of lamivudine compared to lamivudine plus adefovir dipivoxil for treatment naïve patients with chronic hepatitis B: week 52 analysis. J Hepatol. 2003;25
- Efficacy of lamivudine in patients with hepatitis B e antigen-negative/hepatitis B virus DNA-positive (precore mutant) chronic hepatitis B. Lamivudine Precore Mutant Study Group. Hepatology. 1999;29:889–896
- Clinical emergence of entecavir-resistant hepatitis B virus requires additional substitutions in virus already resistant to Lamivudine. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48:3498–3507
- . Management of the hepatitis B virus in the liver transplantation setting: a European and an American perspective. Liver Transpl. 2005;11:716–732
- Comparison of adefovir and tenofovir in the treatment of lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus infection. Hepatology. 2004;40:1421–1425
- . Reactivation of viral replication after replacement of tenofovir by adefovir. Hepatology. 2005;42:239–240
- Durability of HBeAg seroconversion following antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B: relation to type of therapy and pretreatment serum hepatitis B virus DNA and alanine aminotransferase. Gut. 2003;52:420–424
- Long-term follow-up of alpha-interferon treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology. 2004;39:804–810
- Fanconi syndrome and renal failure induced by tenofovir: a first case report. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002;40:1331–1333
- Long-term lamivudine monotherapy in renal-transplant recipients with hepatitis-B-related cirrhosis. Antivir Ther. 2005;10:709–713
- High doses of alpha-interferon are required in chronic hepatitis due to coinfection with hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus: long term results of a prospective randomized trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:2973–2977
- Lamivudine treatment for decompensated cirrhosis resulting from chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology. 2000;31:207–210
- Selection of a hepatitis B virus strain resistant to adefovir in a liver transplantation patient. J Hepatol. 2003;39:1085–1089
- . Lamivudine treatment in patients with severely decompensated cirrhosis due to replicating hepatitis B infection. J Hepatol. 2000;33:301–307
- Frequency of hepatitis B virus reactivation in cancer patients undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy: a prospective study of 626 patients with identification of risk factors. J Med Virol. 2000;62:299–307
- . Diagnosis, prevention and management of hepatitis B virus reactivation during anticancer therapy. Hepatology. 2006;43:209–220
- . Evolution of multi-drug resistant hepatits B viurs during sequential therapy: implications on rescue therapy. Hepatology. 2006;44:703–712
- . Long-term follow-up of interferon alfa treatment in Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis B infection: the effect on hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion and the development of cirrhosis-related complications. Hepatology. 2001;34:139–145
- . Factors associated with hepatitis B virus DNA breakthrough in patients receiving prolonged lamivudine therapy. Hepatology. 2001;34:785–791
- Week 48 resistance surveillance in two phase 3 clinical studies of adefovir dipivoxil for chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology. 2003;38:96–103
- Hepatitis B virus genotypes and virologic response in 694 patients in phase III studies of adefovir dipivoxil1. Gastroenterology. 2003;125:107–116
- . Effect of alpha-interferon treatment in patients with hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B. A meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 1993;119:312–323
- . Clinical course after stopping lamivudine in chronic hepatitis B patients with lamivudine-resistant mutants. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004;19:323–329
☆ Jury: Alfredo Alberti, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Italy; Giuseppe Cariti, Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Massimo Colombo, Department of Gastroenterology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Antonio Craxì, Department of Gastroenterology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy; Gaetano Filice, Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; Massimo Levrero, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Rome La Sapienza, Rome, Italy; Francesco Mazzotta, Department of Infectious Diseases, S.S. Annunziata Hospital, Antella, Firenze, Italy; Giuseppe Pastore, Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Bari, Italy; Felice Piccinino, Department of Infectious Diseases SUN, Napoli, Italy; Giovanni Raimondo, Unit of Clinical and Molecular Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy; Evangelista Sagnelli, Department of Infectious Diseases SUN, Napoli, Italy; Mario Toti, Department of Infectious Diseases, Grosseto Hospital, Grosseto, Italy. Expert Panel and Working Groups’ Tutors: Maurizia Brunetto, Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Raffaele Bruno, Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; Vito Di Marco, Department of Gastroenterology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy; Carlo Ferrari, Unit of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, Parma, Italy; Giovanni B. Gaeta, Department of Infectious Diseases SUN, Napoli, Italy; Pietro Lampertico, Department of Gastroenterology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Alfredo Marzano, Department of Gastroenterology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Teresa Pollicino, Unit of Clinical and Molecular Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy; Massimo Puoti, Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy; Teresa Santantonio, Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Bari, Italy; Antonina Smedile, Department of Gastroenterology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
PII: S1590-8658(08)00112-6
doi:10.1016/j.dld.2008.03.011
© 2008 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Inc All rights reserved.
